2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.135026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recycled concrete aggregate incorporated cold bituminous emulsion mixture: Mechanical, environmental and economic evaluation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It may save a significant amount of fuel consumption, making it cheaper and environmentally friendly [5]. As per Jain and Singh, 2022 [6], the cost and CO 2 emissions of CBEM were 19% and 45.89% lower than HMA, respectively. However, their applicability is somewhat limited due to their lower early strength.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…It may save a significant amount of fuel consumption, making it cheaper and environmentally friendly [5]. As per Jain and Singh, 2022 [6], the cost and CO 2 emissions of CBEM were 19% and 45.89% lower than HMA, respectively. However, their applicability is somewhat limited due to their lower early strength.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Ling and Bahia 2018 [31] introduced some new volumetric parameters, i.e., absorbed water volume by aggregates (VWA) and voids filled with water (VFW), based on different phases for CBEM with other parameters of HMA, i.e., air void (VA), total binder volume (VB), absorbed binder volume (VBA), effective binder volume (VBE), voids in mineral aggregates (VMA) and voids filled with bitumen (VFB). The volumetric parameters of CBEM are expressed from equation (3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12), corresponding to both phases.…”
Section: Volumetric Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It does not require heating since it has a lower production temperature, making it both economical and environmentally friendly (Al-Busaltan et al 2012). A study conducted by (Jain and Singh 2022) showed that the CBEM manufacturing can reduce costs and CO 2 emissions by around 20% and 46%, respectively, compared to HMA. Despite these significant benefits, CBEM has several disadvantages, such as lower early strength, higher air voids, poor moisture susceptibility, etc (Needham 1996, Read and Whiteoak 2003, Thanaya 2007a, which can further facilitates the rutting deformation, also.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%