1991
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-662-07071-0_18
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recursive Utility Under Uncertainty

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the case of risky consumption processes, that is, where objects of choice are suitably defined lotteries (probability measures), recursive models are axiomatized in [8,10,24]. Skiadas [30] axiomatizes recursive utility when the domain consists of consumption processes, or Savage-style acts, rather than lotteries.…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For the case of risky consumption processes, that is, where objects of choice are suitably defined lotteries (probability measures), recursive models are axiomatized in [8,10,24]. Skiadas [30] axiomatizes recursive utility when the domain consists of consumption processes, or Savage-style acts, rather than lotteries.…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…An important feature of rectangularity is that it implies that P is uniquely determined by the process of conditional one-step-ahead correspondences P þ1 t : More precisely, begin with an arbitrary set of correspondences 8 …”
Section: Rectangularitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the parameter β is large, the agent puts more weight on the future and less weight on the present, in accordance with the impatience interpretation of this parameter. The preferences represented by (9) have axiomatic underpinnings (e.g., Chew and Epstein (1991)). …”
Section: Application Of the Standard Aggregatormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That the richer structure of the recursive model is a modest extension is demonstrated by the interpretations and plausible results yielded in the simple expressions (18) and (19). The model is based on fundamental assumptions and axioms of rational behavior (Chew and Epstein (1991)). …”
mentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Interpreting the risky asset R as the value weighted market portfolio M corresponding to the S&P-500 index, equations (13) and (14) are two equations in two unknowns that can provide estimates of the two preference 2 There are of course newer data by now, but these retain the same basic features. If our model can explain the data in Table 1, it can explain any of the newer sets as well.…”
Section: The Equilibrium Risk Premium and The Short-term Interest Ratementioning
confidence: 99%