2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jlp.2009.02.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recursive Operability Analysis as a decision support tool for Risk-Based Maintenance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(23 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Once all these preliminary tasks are accomplished, the core part of the method is the execution of the Recursive Operability Analysis (Plus), which consists of the computation of the table represented by the standard format, shown in Table 3. This table is substantially equal to the ROA-CCD table [17,18], which is a more complex version with respect to the classic ROA table [13,16,29]. It can be noticed that Column 1 (Node Deviation Variable), basically condenses the 3 elements of the classic HazOp scheme in a single one, including the plant node, the physical variable, and the deviation type.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Once all these preliminary tasks are accomplished, the core part of the method is the execution of the Recursive Operability Analysis (Plus), which consists of the computation of the table represented by the standard format, shown in Table 3. This table is substantially equal to the ROA-CCD table [17,18], which is a more complex version with respect to the classic ROA table [13,16,29]. It can be noticed that Column 1 (Node Deviation Variable), basically condenses the 3 elements of the classic HazOp scheme in a single one, including the plant node, the physical variable, and the deviation type.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Risks were calculated as a function of the failure probability and through a fault tree technique. Marmo et al (2009) developed a procedure consisting of a risk-based approach to optimize maintenance scheduling.…”
Section: Me Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The problem is that it depends on data accuracy which is not always collectable at the required level of precision (Apeland and Aven, 2000). To extract more efficiency from the large amount of operating data and reduce waste of resources in standby components, more sophisticated methodologies have been developed for maintaining performance of processes that are sensitive to variations (Marmo et al, 2009). The key to these studies is the recognition of continuously monitored performance metrics that provide the basis for modern day reliability decisions.…”
Section: Performance Monitoring and Reliability Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%