Revolutions and Continuity in Greek Mathematics 2018
DOI: 10.1515/9783110565959-009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recursive Knowledge Procedures Informing the Design of the Parthenon : One Instance of Continuity between Greek and Near Eastern Mathematical Practices

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Greeks therefore asked important philosophical questions when they did their higher mathematics. The Golden Mean provoked much discussion of number theory since the ratio (1 to approximately 1.6) could not be expressed in a whole number (Lehman and Weinman, 2018).…”
Section: Ancient Greek Mathematicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Greeks therefore asked important philosophical questions when they did their higher mathematics. The Golden Mean provoked much discussion of number theory since the ratio (1 to approximately 1.6) could not be expressed in a whole number (Lehman and Weinman, 2018).…”
Section: Ancient Greek Mathematicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar ratios are also found in ancient buildings in other parts of the world. One example is from ancient Greek architecture is the Parthenon, which was constructed using the ratio 4:9 in several aspects ( Penprase 2017; Lehman and Weinman 2018; Shear 2016; Barbara 2005), and another example is the Temple of Hera Lacinia (Marconi 2016; Woodward 2013). The Apollo Temple at Sicyon has a plan dimension in the ratio of 4:13 approximately (Woodward 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ratio of the column height to the peristyle width of the facade of the unfinished temple at Segesta is in the ratio 4:9, even though its plan dimensions are not in this ratio (Jones 2001). The ratio of diameter to the interaxial length between the columns is also in the ratio of 4:9 (Shear 2016; Lehman and Weinman 2018; Jones 2001). For a length of 9 units, a column of 4 units diameter is provided for a width to height ratio of 4:9.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%