2019
DOI: 10.1049/iet-cta.2018.6413
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recursive identification for Wiener non‐linear systems with non‐stationary disturbances

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, Dong et al developed the recursive least squares algorithm for the Wiener nonlinear systems based on the auxiliary model idea. 28 Du et al investigated the online recursive identification approach to identifying the continuous-time switched nonlinear state-space models and proposed the subspace-based method to estimate the switching signal. 29 Zhang et al derived the recursive projection algorithm to identify the finite impulse response systems with binary-valued observations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Dong et al developed the recursive least squares algorithm for the Wiener nonlinear systems based on the auxiliary model idea. 28 Du et al investigated the online recursive identification approach to identifying the continuous-time switched nonlinear state-space models and proposed the subspace-based method to estimate the switching signal. 29 Zhang et al derived the recursive projection algorithm to identify the finite impulse response systems with binary-valued observations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…System identification and model parameter estimation are basic in controller design, dynamic systems modeling, and signal processing 1,2 . Different identification methods have been proposed for linear systems and nonlinear systems, such as the least squares methods, 3‐5 the maximum likelihood methods, 6‐8 the gradient methods, 9 the orthogonal matching pursuit methods, 10 and the robust identification methods 11,12 . However, most of these methods assumed that the input–output data are available at every sampling instant.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,2 Different identification methods have been proposed for linear systems and nonlinear systems, such as the least squares methods, [3][4][5] the maximum likelihood methods, [6][7][8] the gradient methods, 9 the orthogonal matching pursuit methods, 10 and the robust identification methods. 11,12 However, most of these methods assumed that the input-output data are available at every sampling instant. In other words, the outputs and the inputs have the same sampling rates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To deal with time-varying disturbance, forgetting factors were suggested to establish recursive identification algorithms [29][30][31] which could result in the asymptotic convergence of model parameter estimation under such disturbance. Nonetheless, a constant forgetting factor may fail to yield good accuracy in estimating the system model parameters, and therefore, variable forgetting factors were proposed to tackle different types of time-varying load disturbances [32][33][34][35]. However, these recursive identification methods based on forgetting factors could not be used to identify the delay parameter for a time-delay system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%