2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.sigpro.2015.03.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recursive estimation for nonlinear stochastic systems with multi-step transmission delays, multiple packet dropouts and correlated noises

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
51
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A modified fuzzy Kalmantype filtering [5] is presented with finite-step auto-correlated process noises depending on the system state. For the linear discrete time-varying systems with 20 stochastic uncertainties, a realistic mathematical model named the uncertain state-dependent (also called multiplicative) noise [6,7,8,9] is widely applied in a range of scientific and industrial applications. The information fusion steadystate Kalman filtering approach [10] involves different local dynamic models and correlated noises.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A modified fuzzy Kalmantype filtering [5] is presented with finite-step auto-correlated process noises depending on the system state. For the linear discrete time-varying systems with 20 stochastic uncertainties, a realistic mathematical model named the uncertain state-dependent (also called multiplicative) noise [6,7,8,9] is widely applied in a range of scientific and industrial applications. The information fusion steadystate Kalman filtering approach [10] involves different local dynamic models and correlated noises.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the design of the filtering algorithms to reduce the negative influences of the time- 35 delays has received increasing research attention. The augmented state approach [18,19,20] applies the partial differential equation (PDE) and boundary condition equation, and the polynomial approach [21,22] is utilized to solve the multiple time-delay systems. In order to reduce the communication burden, the measurement transformation approach [17, 23,24,25] uses the reorganized 40 measurement sequence, and the delayed system is transformed into the form of the equivalent delay-free counterpart.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, when the sensors send their measurements to the processing center via a communication network some additional network-induced phenomena, such as random delays or measurement losses, inevitably arise during this transmission process, which can spoil the fusion estimators performance and motivate the design of fusion estimation algorithms for systems with one (or even several) of the aforementioned uncertainties (see e.g., [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24], and references therein). All the above cited papers on signal estimation with random transmission delays assume independent random delays at each sensor and mutually independent delays between the different sensors; in [25] this restriction was weakened and random delays featuring correlation at consecutive sampling times were considered, thus allowing to deal with some common practical situations (e.g., those in which two consecutive observations cannot be delayed).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this reason, the fairly conservative assumption that the measurement noises are uncorrelated is commonly weakened in many of the aforementioned research papers on signal estimation. Namely, the optimal Kalman filtering fusion problem in systems with noise cross-correlation at consecutive sampling times is addressed, for example, in [19]; also, under different types of noise correlation, centralized and distributed fusion algorithms for systems with multiplicative noise are obtained in [11,20], and for systems where the measurements might have partial information about the signal in [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this is not a realistic consideration in many practical situations; for this reason, this conservative assumption is commonly weakened in many papers concerning the signal estimation problem in networked systems, and the presence of correlated noise in the sensor data makes the design of signal estimation algorithms more challenging and interesting. The optimal Kalman filtering fusion problem in systems with cross-correlated noises at consecutive sampling times is addressed, for example, in [14] for systems with multistep transmission delays and multiple packet dropouts, by transforming the system into a stochastic parameterized one. Also, centralized and distributed fusion algorithms are obtained in [15] for uncertain systems with correlated noises and in [5] for systems where the measurements might randomly contain only partial information about the signal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%