Proceedings of the 27th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management 2018
DOI: 10.1145/3269206.3272003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recurrent Spatio-Temporal Point Process for Check-in Time Prediction

Abstract: We introduce a new problem, namely, check-in time prediction where the goal is to predict the time when a given user will check-in to a location of interest. We design a novel Recurrent Spatio-Temporal Point Process (RSTPP) model for check-in time prediction. RSTPP addresses two key challenges: 1) Data scarcity due to uneven distribution of check-ins among users/locations. 2) User trajectories contain valuable information that is ignored by standard temporal point process which only considers historical event … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Cai et al [37] present a long-and short-term Hawkes process (LSHP) model, which combines two Hawkes processes to capture "mutual-influence" of different behaviors as well as "self-influence" of behaviors of the same type. Yang et al [36] design a novel Recurrent Spatio-Temporal Point Process (RSTPP) to learn the latent dependencies of event times over behavior sequences. Compared with other methods, RSTPP can utilize abundant spatio-temporal information of precedent records for predicting the time of users' next checkin behaviors.…”
Section: B Temporal Point Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cai et al [37] present a long-and short-term Hawkes process (LSHP) model, which combines two Hawkes processes to capture "mutual-influence" of different behaviors as well as "self-influence" of behaviors of the same type. Yang et al [36] design a novel Recurrent Spatio-Temporal Point Process (RSTPP) to learn the latent dependencies of event times over behavior sequences. Compared with other methods, RSTPP can utilize abundant spatio-temporal information of precedent records for predicting the time of users' next checkin behaviors.…”
Section: B Temporal Point Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another approach [13] is a generic model for predicting user trajectories as well as next product recommendation. Recent approaches for checkin time prediction are limited to a single dataset [5,19,37]. They also model event-times as random variables rather than sequential flows and thus cannot be used for transfer across regions.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, Marked Temporal Point Processes(MTPP) have outperformed other neural architectures for characterizing asynchronous events localized in continuous time and are even used in a wide range of applications, including healthcare [29], finance [1,39], and social networks [15,23,40]. Recent works that deploy MTPP for predicting user mobility patterns are either: (i) limited to predicting the time of user-location interactions rather than actual locations [37], (ii) restricted to one dataset without a foreseeable way to easily utilize external information [19], or (iii) disregard the opportunity to reuse trained parameters from external datasets by jointly embedding the checkin and time distributions [5]. Thus, none of these approaches can be used for designing mobility prediction models for limited data regions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Precisely estimating the locations and times of the future earthquake events and criminal activities could save many lives and predicting malfunctions in an electrical grid could reduce the maintenance times and costs [6], [3], [4]. Despite these critical applications, certain difficulties such as the nonstationarity in both time and space in the data restrict the application of standard approaches [7], [8]. Therefore, we introduce a novel prediction algorithm that models point generations in adaptive subregions with interacting point processes.…”
Section: A Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%