2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.otohns.2005.04.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recurrent Pleomorphic Adenoma of the Parotid Gland

Abstract: All 7 patients with recurrent disease underwent subtotal parotidectomy with "negative" surgical margins. Total parotidectomy or subtotal petrosectomy with facial nerve resection in selected cases may reduce the risk of multiple episodes of pleomorphic adenoma recurrence. Two of 42 patients were found to have carcinoma ex-pleomorphic adenoma, both of these patients underwent prior radiotherapy, and both died of metastatic disease.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
43
0
3

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
43
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…When it occurs, recurrence of pleomorphic adenoma is often difficult to treat since satellite nodules are common. Multiple satellite nodules and previous dissection increase the risk of facial nerve injury [12,13]. In recurrent pleomorphic adenoma, treatment involves revision parotidectomy with an attempt to spare the facial nerve when it is not infiltrated by tumor.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When it occurs, recurrence of pleomorphic adenoma is often difficult to treat since satellite nodules are common. Multiple satellite nodules and previous dissection increase the risk of facial nerve injury [12,13]. In recurrent pleomorphic adenoma, treatment involves revision parotidectomy with an attempt to spare the facial nerve when it is not infiltrated by tumor.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4,5 However, several investigations have shown a good prognosis for cases of CEPA with minor extracapsular invasion, although there is confusion about the threshold between minor and wide extracapsular invasion. 4,6,[10][11][12] Also, there is no information about the prognosis of CEPA associated with primary PA compared with that of CEPA associated with recurrent PA. [13][14][15][16] We therefore decided to investigate a large series of cases of CEPA in which we could: correlate survival with the stages of histological progression; determine the threshold of extracapsular invasion where minor invasion becomes wide invasion with regard to prognosis; and compare the prognosis of CEPA associated with primary PA with that of CEPA associated with recurrent PA.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is of paramount importance to ensure the removal of every bit of epithelium in the cavity to avoid a recurrent cholesteatoma. The stapes superstructure is removed, because leaving it behind could allow fat to exert a pistonlike pressure on the stapes or frank subluxation, leading to postoperative vertigo . The closure of the ET is an important step, and it must be done meticulously to prevent an opening.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%