1990
DOI: 10.1016/0140-6736(90)91945-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recurrent lesions in human Leishmania braziliensis infection—reactivation or reinfection?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
78
1
8

Year Published

1992
1992
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 130 publications
(89 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
2
78
1
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Others papers reinforce this view , Stenger et al 1996, Bogdan & Röllinghoff 1998. Such mechanisms, possibly related to reinfection (Saravia et al 1990) due to repeated phlebotomine bites in former patients that kept living in ATL endemic areas, could have contributed to the maintenance of the immune response.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Others papers reinforce this view , Stenger et al 1996, Bogdan & Röllinghoff 1998. Such mechanisms, possibly related to reinfection (Saravia et al 1990) due to repeated phlebotomine bites in former patients that kept living in ATL endemic areas, could have contributed to the maintenance of the immune response.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…In these cases, diagnosis depends on the finding of parasites in the reactivated lesion, what is another evidence that scars may shelter amastigotes that could be responsible for active lesions, although the possibility of a new infection can not be excluded (Oliveira 1977, Saravia et al 1990). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the recurrence of cutaneous lesions and parasite persistence has been reported in patients treated for CL 24 ; there are also reports describing the detection of leishmanial DNA by means of polymerase chain reaction in patients with visceral leishmaniasis who received treatment with antimonials and were believed to be cured. 25,26 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are no appropriate biochemical or molecular markers to distinguish a resident parasite from a newcomer, unless the latter clearly belongs to a different group or population. Karyotype analyses lacks of sensitivity and do not seem to correlate with the zymodeme analysis (Saravia et al 1990); isoenzymes are useful in discriminating species but lack the sensitivity to distinguish or-ganisms of the same population (Saravia et al 1990), restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis (RFLP) involving unique nuclear genes are in general insensitive, and kinetoplast minicircle restriction analysis analysis (Morel et al 1980) provide unstable markers, as Pacheco et al (1995) have shown, variable sequence polymorphisms can emerge during experimental infections with cloned L. guyanensis cells. It remain to be tested whether RAPDs analysis targeted in other Leishmania sequences can provide the right tool (Macedo et al 1992).…”
Section: Persistencymentioning
confidence: 99%