2000
DOI: 10.1177/01466210022031778
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recurrent Issues and Recent Advances in Scoring Performance Assessments

Abstract: A conceptual framework is provided to guide the development of scoring procedures for performance assessments. Within this framework are four questions: (1) what aspects of the performance are to be scored, (2) what criteria are to be applied to evaluate the identified aspects or components of the performance, (3) how should the scoring criteria be developed, and (4) how should these criteria be applied? The historical limitations of performance assessments are reviewed and recent efforts to avoid those limita… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
0
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
35
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Different versions of the DPA were employed, involving rating scales of different lengths and a different degree of decomposition into subtasks. The fine grained version involves a highly analytical judgment, whereas the global task area form requires a more holistic judgment (Clauser, 2000). The question can be raised whether both versions are equally decisive and informative about the state of the drivers' driving proficiency.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different versions of the DPA were employed, involving rating scales of different lengths and a different degree of decomposition into subtasks. The fine grained version involves a highly analytical judgment, whereas the global task area form requires a more holistic judgment (Clauser, 2000). The question can be raised whether both versions are equally decisive and informative about the state of the drivers' driving proficiency.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Staff from both projects met informally over the years to exchange information. The NBME examination with automated scoring of Step 3 (Primum Computer Case Simulations) became operational in 2000 (P. Harik, personal communication, July 14, 2014), backed by a considerable body of research (Clauser 2000;Clauser et al 2002;Clyman et al 1995). 34 The system is currently owned by Measurement Incorporated.…”
Section: Automated Scoringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to traditional forms of assessment, performance assessments are not standardized tests. This implies that traditional reliability indices may not be suitable to apply to performance assessments (Clauser, 2000;Dochy, 2009). Kane (1996) points out that the precision of measurements is broader than just reliability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%