2018
DOI: 10.1111/apha.13064
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recurrent inhibition is higher in eccentric compared to isometric and concentric maximal voluntary contractions

Abstract: Together, the current results indicate that recurrent inhibition is elevated for the soleus muscle during eccentric compared to isometric and concentric MVC. Data further suggest that the Renshaw cell activity is specifically controlled by the descending neural drive and/or peripheral neural mechanisms during eccentric MVC.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

3
34
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
3
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Specifically, when assessing spinal mechanisms responsible for the inability to fully active motor neurones during maximal eccentric muscle actions, reduced evoked H‐reflex responses consistently have been observed for lengthening compared to isometric or shortening contractions performed at both maximal and submaximal effort, indicating suppressed motor neurone excitability and/or an elevated levels of presynaptic or postsynaptic inhibition. As also mentioned by Barrué‐Belou et al, previous study reports suggest that the modulation in corticospinal excitability during eccentric contraction mainly depends on pre‐ and postsynaptic inhibitory mechanisms acting at the spinal level, although the specific nature and relative contribution of these spinal inhibitory mechanisms remain unknown. Moreover, no knowledge exists about the descending control of these spinal pathways from supraspinal centres.…”
mentioning
confidence: 73%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Specifically, when assessing spinal mechanisms responsible for the inability to fully active motor neurones during maximal eccentric muscle actions, reduced evoked H‐reflex responses consistently have been observed for lengthening compared to isometric or shortening contractions performed at both maximal and submaximal effort, indicating suppressed motor neurone excitability and/or an elevated levels of presynaptic or postsynaptic inhibition. As also mentioned by Barrué‐Belou et al, previous study reports suggest that the modulation in corticospinal excitability during eccentric contraction mainly depends on pre‐ and postsynaptic inhibitory mechanisms acting at the spinal level, although the specific nature and relative contribution of these spinal inhibitory mechanisms remain unknown. Moreover, no knowledge exists about the descending control of these spinal pathways from supraspinal centres.…”
mentioning
confidence: 73%
“…As stated by Barrué‐Belou et al cortical and spinal neural mechanisms involved in the modulation of the neural drive during eccentric contraction have previously been investigated by comparing the effect of muscle contraction type (i) on the motor evoked potential elicited by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), (ii) on the cervicomedullary motor evoked potential (CMEP) and (iii) on the Hoffmann reflex (H‐reflex, V‐wave) obtained by electrical stimulation of the peripheral motor nerve (for recent reviews, see Duchateau and Enoka, and Aagaard). Specifically, when assessing spinal mechanisms responsible for the inability to fully active motor neurones during maximal eccentric muscle actions, reduced evoked H‐reflex responses consistently have been observed for lengthening compared to isometric or shortening contractions performed at both maximal and submaximal effort, indicating suppressed motor neurone excitability and/or an elevated levels of presynaptic or postsynaptic inhibition.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations