Recurrent Cholangitis Secondary to a Traumatic Biliary Neuroma

Rayyan, Nadin Y.; Aburumman, Razan; Altaweel, Luma; Albustami, Nadwa; Al‐Abbadi, Mousa A.; Rayyan, Yaser

doi:10.1159/000525270

Cited by 16 publications

(13 citation statements)

References 14 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Following the searches, duplicate records were removed in EndNote before results were uploaded into Rayyan© online collaborative systematic review software (16) for record management and title and abstract screening. A two-part screening process against the inclusion criteria was used: (a) a title and abstract review and (b) full text review.…”

Section: Selection Of Sources Of Evidence and Charting The Datamentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Clinical Methods Supporting Recognition of Early Post-Stroke Seizures: A Systematic Scoping Review

Gordon

Emsley

Lightbody

et al. 2023

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Stroke is one of the commonest cause of seizures and epilepsy and is the leading cause of epilepsy over the age of 60 (1, 2). Post-stroke seizures and epilepsy are associated with increased mortality, disability and recurrent hospital admissions (3, 4). Seizures occurring in the immediate aftermath of the acute stroke can complicate a patient's stroke diagnosis and management or can even go undiagnosed resulting in increased risk of mortality, disability and hospital readmissions. There is limited evidence on detection, observation, diagnosis and management of early post-stroke seizures as part of acute stroke treatment. Objectives: The objective of this series of scoping reviews is to map the extent and type of literature in relation to in-hospital early post-stroke seizures. For this paper, the specific objectives relate to the clinical methods used in the bedside identification and observation, usually performed by nurses, of early post-stroke seizures (EPSS) in adults being treated and managed for acute stroke. Eligibility criteria: Participants included adults aged 18 years or older with acute ischaemic stroke or primary intracerebral haemorrhage and a diagnosis, or suspected diagnosis, of post-stroke seizures whilst receiving hospital care for their acute stroke. Sources of evidence: Medline, CINAHL, Embase, and the Cochrane Library databases were searched, including papers published up to October 2021, limited to English language. A broad range of published literature was selected comprising of primary research, including case studies/case reports, conference abstracts, systematic reviews/meta-analyses, clinical guidelines and consensus statements. Reference lists of included studies were also searched. Charting methods: A data charting table was developed by the reviewers, with key information selected for included articles. Findings have been aggregated to an overview of extent and type of evidence and identify gaps in evidence. Results: We included two research papers, two clinical guidelines and four discussion papers. There was limited literature on clinical methods used to identify and observe acute stroke patients for seizures. We found no evaluation of different methods aimed at recognising and observing EPSS, and subsequently recommendations lacking detail and consensus on clinical processes. Conclusion: Early post-stroke seizures are important to diagnose due to associated increases in post-stroke complications, mortality, disability and recurrent hospital admissions. Whilst the diagnostic challenge of EPSS is recognised, there is a need for research looking into how to improve the identification and observation of seizure activity in acute stroke settings.

show abstract

Section: Selection Of Sources Of Evidence and Charting The Datamentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Critical appraisal within sources of evidence 16 If done, present data on critical appraisal of included sources of evidence (see item 12). N/A…”

Section: -7mentioning

confidence: 99%

Clinical Methods Supporting Recognition of Early Post-Stroke Seizures: A Systematic Scoping Review

Gordon

Emsley

Lightbody

et al. 2023

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Title and abstract screening will then be done to assess the relevance of the articles. To avoid any bias among the reviewers, two of the reviewers (authors HJ and MS) will use Rayyan (Rayyan Systems, Massachusetts, USA) 53 to independently review the articles, blinded from other reviewers' decisions or comments. Rayyan is a free tool to help reviewers with the initial screening of titles and abstracts to filter searches for eligible studies for systematic reviews.…”

Section: Stage 3: Study Selectionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Early identification and characterisation of stroke to support prehospital decision-making using artificial intelligence: a scoping review protocol

Jalo,

Seth,

Pikkarainen

et al. 2023

BMJ Open

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

IntroductionStroke is a time-critical condition and one of the leading causes of mortality and disability worldwide. To decrease mortality and improve patient outcome by improving access to optimal treatment, there is an emerging need to improve the accuracy of the methods used to identify and characterise stroke in prehospital settings and emergency departments (EDs). This might be accomplished by developing computerised decision support systems (CDSSs) that are based on artificial intelligence (AI) and potential new data sources such as vital signs, biomarkers and image and video analysis. This scoping review aims to summarise literature on existing methods for early characterisation of stroke by using AI.Methods and analysisThe review will be performed with respect to the Arksey and O’Malley’s model. Peer-reviewed articles about AI-based CDSSs for the characterisation of stroke or new potential data sources for stroke CDSSs, published between January 1995 and April 2023 and written in English, will be included. Studies reporting methods that depend on mobile CT scanning or with no focus on prehospital or ED care will be excluded. Screening will be done in two steps: title and abstract screening followed by full-text screening. Two reviewers will perform the screening process independently, and a third reviewer will be involved in case of disagreement. Final decision will be made based on majority vote. Results will be reported using a descriptive summary and thematic analysis.Ethics and disseminationThe methodology used in the protocol is based on information publicly available and does not need ethical approval. The results from the review will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal. The findings will be shared at relevant national and international conferences and meetings in the field of digital health and neurology.

show abstract

“…Initially, retrieved articles from the 4 databases were imported into Endnote on the web, a citation manager, where we removed duplicates before exporting the search results to Rayyan [21], a web-based platform to facilitate collaborative systematic review processes. First, we screened the titles and abstracts of all the search results, guided by our inclusion and exclusion criteria.…”

Section: Study Selectionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Cost-effectiveness of Digital Tools for Behavior Change Interventions Among People With Chronic Diseases: Systematic Review (Preprint)

Kyaw¹

2022

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BACKGROUND Chronic diseases contribute to the largest burden of disease worldwide, having negative impacts on the patients themselves and their family members. Modifiable behavioural risk factors (smoking, overconsuming alcohol, and unhealthy diets) cause worse health outcomes among people with chronic diseases such as cardiovascular diseases, diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and cerebrovascular diseases. With smartphones and easy access to the internet, it is possible to use information technology to better one’s health. OBJECTIVE To investigate the cost-effectiveness of digital health interventions for behavioural change among people with chronic diseases METHODS This is a systematic review of published studies on the cost-effectiveness of using digital tools for behavioural change among people with chronic diseases. Economic evaluations using digital tools were included if the target population comprised adult people with chronic diseases, and the intervention aimed at behaviour change. Two researchers conducted independent screening according to the eligibility criteria. RESULTS A total of 20 studies were included after the final screening, published from 2003 to 2021. All studies were conducted in high-income countries. Telephone, text messaging, mobile health applications and website/online were digital tools for behaviour change communication. Almost all studies (8/9) with full economic evaluation found digital health interventions to be cost-effective. A majority of studies (6/11) with partial economic evaluation concluded that digital health intervention was cost-saving. Most studies (17/20) used a healthcare payer perspective for economic analysis. CONCLUSIONS Digital health interventions for behavioural change among people with chronic diseases are cost-effective in high-income settings and has the potential to be cost-effective in low and middle-income countries (LMICs). As all studies in this review were for high-income countries, more studies are needed for LMICs. Scaling up digital health interventions for chronic diseases in high-income and LMICs is possible.

show abstract

Recurrent Cholangitis Secondary to a Traumatic Biliary Neuroma

Cited by 16 publications

References 14 publications

Clinical Methods Supporting Recognition of Early Post-Stroke Seizures: A Systematic Scoping Review

Clinical Methods Supporting Recognition of Early Post-Stroke Seizures: A Systematic Scoping Review

Early identification and characterisation of stroke to support prehospital decision-making using artificial intelligence: a scoping review protocol

Cost-effectiveness of Digital Tools for Behavior Change Interventions Among People With Chronic Diseases: Systematic Review (Preprint)

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About