2003
DOI: 10.1017/s0033291703007384
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recurrent brief depression – more investigations in clinical samples are now required

Abstract: Classifications of depression based on secondary care samples may have little relevance in primary care settings, where many patients do not fulfil criteria for major depression; for example, through having depressive symptoms that are either too mild or too brief. And yet many such patients receive antidepressant treatments (antidepressants and various psychotherapies). At a time when the appropriate recognition and treatment of people with depressive symptoms is the subject of much discussion, and there is c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 20 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the DSM-5 (American Psychiatric Association, 2013), RBD is placed within the group 'other specified depressive disorder': to meet the diagnosis, depressive episodes must be characterized by at least five symptoms and must be associated with functional impairment, but should last less than 14 days. However, the only large randomized placebo-controlled trial, of the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor fluoxetine in patients with RBD and repeated suicide attempts, found no evidence of efficacy (Montgomery et al, 1994), and treatment studies with paroxetine have also yielded disappointing results (Kasper et al, 1995): there is a persistent need for additional placebo-controlled treatment studies in clinical samples (Baldwin, 2003). Case reports and small case series suggest that patients with RBD may benefit from treatment with nimodipine (Pazzaglia et al, 1993), tranylcypromine (Joffe, 1996), mirtazapine (Stamenkovic et al, 1998), lithium (Corominas et al, 1998), fluoxetine (Stamenkovic et al, 2001), reboxetine (Pezawas et al, 2002), lamotrigine (Ravindran and Ravindran, 2007) and olanzapine (De la Fuente, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the DSM-5 (American Psychiatric Association, 2013), RBD is placed within the group 'other specified depressive disorder': to meet the diagnosis, depressive episodes must be characterized by at least five symptoms and must be associated with functional impairment, but should last less than 14 days. However, the only large randomized placebo-controlled trial, of the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor fluoxetine in patients with RBD and repeated suicide attempts, found no evidence of efficacy (Montgomery et al, 1994), and treatment studies with paroxetine have also yielded disappointing results (Kasper et al, 1995): there is a persistent need for additional placebo-controlled treatment studies in clinical samples (Baldwin, 2003). Case reports and small case series suggest that patients with RBD may benefit from treatment with nimodipine (Pazzaglia et al, 1993), tranylcypromine (Joffe, 1996), mirtazapine (Stamenkovic et al, 1998), lithium (Corominas et al, 1998), fluoxetine (Stamenkovic et al, 2001), reboxetine (Pezawas et al, 2002), lamotrigine (Ravindran and Ravindran, 2007) and olanzapine (De la Fuente, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%