2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsgi.2005.02.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recurrent Biparental Hydatidiform Mole: Additional Evidence for a 1.1-Mb Locus in 19q13.4 and Candidate Gene Analysis

Abstract: The reported candidate region for BiCHM in 19q13.4 was confirmed in additional families, further establishing it as the major locus that harbors a gene mutated in this condition.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another locus that maps to the equivalent region in humans, 19q13.4, also affects placental growth (Panichkul et al 2005). This locus influences susceptibility to biparental complete hydatidiform moles (BiCHM), which are characterized by the presence of hyperplastic trophoblast villi and lack of a fetus.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another locus that maps to the equivalent region in humans, 19q13.4, also affects placental growth (Panichkul et al 2005). This locus influences susceptibility to biparental complete hydatidiform moles (BiCHM), which are characterized by the presence of hyperplastic trophoblast villi and lack of a fetus.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, the parental contribution to approximately 70 HM tissues from patients with two defective alleles in NLRP7 have been characterized and all of them were found to be diploid biparental (55, 62, 63, 87, 98100) with the exception of one tissue that was digynic (101). However, this is not the case for HM tissues from patients with single heterozygous rare NLRP7 variants.…”
Section: Genotype Of Hm Tissues In Patients With Nlrp7 Mutationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In nearly all hydatidiform moles the maternal chromosomes have been physically lost; but rare examples of 'biparental' moles that retain the maternal genome have been described (Sunde et al, 1993;Helwani et al, 1999;Sensi et al, 2000;Panichkul et al, 2005). In these tumors there is nonetheless markedly reduced expression of paternally imprinted/ maternally expressed genes, suggesting that the androgenetic gene expression state in these variant cases has been arrived at by failure of maternal imprinting, and that this state is truly essential for tumor formation (Fisher et al, 2002;ElMaarri et al, 2003).…”
Section: Imprinted Genes In Placental Neoplasiamentioning
confidence: 99%