1993
DOI: 10.1016/0020-1383(93)90057-d
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recurrent anterior glenohumeral joint dislocation and torsion of the humerus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The strap was used to prevent movement of the humerus, particularly when the scanner table moved between imaging of the proximal to the distal humerus. This CT method of measuring humeral head retroversion has been previously described by Hill et al 19 and has shown high reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC], 0.9) 12 and validity (within 1.6° of cadaveric measurements). 37 One author (C.C.…”
Section: Computed Tomographymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The strap was used to prevent movement of the humerus, particularly when the scanner table moved between imaging of the proximal to the distal humerus. This CT method of measuring humeral head retroversion has been previously described by Hill et al 19 and has shown high reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC], 0.9) 12 and validity (within 1.6° of cadaveric measurements). 37 One author (C.C.…”
Section: Computed Tomographymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ayrıca Dias ve ark. (22) tomografik olarak yaptıkları ölçümler sonucunda sağ ve sol taraf humerus retroversiyon açı değerleri arasında anlamlı bir fark olmadığını ve bir taraf humerus retroversiyon açısının diğer taraf için referans olarak alınabileceğini bildirmişlerdir. Biz de çalışmamızda, kırık tarafın kontrol grubu olarak aynı bireyin sağlam tarafını aldık.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…Currently, for side-to-side differences of external and internal rotation at 90° shoulder abduction in overhead athletes, [1][2][3]5 humeral retroversion has been a topic of focus. Using radiography, Osbahr et al 3 and Reagan et al 5 reported on the side-toside difference in glenohumeral-rotation range of motion and humeral retroversion for college baseball players. Using computed tomography (CT), Crockett et al 2 and Chant et al 1 described side-to-side differences of glenohumeral-rotation range of motion and humeral retroversion in baseball players compared with control subjects.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Differences in humeral retroversion between the throwing and nonthrowing shoulders in throwing athletes have been well documented using radiography 3,5 or CT. 1,2 Means of the humeral-retroversion angle for overhead athletes ranged from 33° to 49° in previous studies. Most researchers 1,2,[8][9][10] have found no sideto-side difference in control groups.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%