2015
DOI: 10.1111/joic.12255
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recurrent and Residual Shunts After Patent Foramen Ovale Closure: Results From a Long‐Term Transcranial Doppler Study

Abstract: A significant number of recurrent and residual shunts may be observed by cTCD up to 5 years after PFO closure. Management of late RLSs includes periodic re-evaluation, exclusion of device-induced complications or secondary sources of RLS, and optimization of antithrombotic treatment with or without a second intervention.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All patients underwent contrast transcranial Doppler at FU. There was a residual RLS in 29% at 1 year and 17% at 5-years FU 17. These results are comparable to our findings.…”
supporting
confidence: 92%
“…All patients underwent contrast transcranial Doppler at FU. There was a residual RLS in 29% at 1 year and 17% at 5-years FU 17. These results are comparable to our findings.…”
supporting
confidence: 92%
“…In a study by Cheli et al, a right‐to‐left shunt was still detectable on transcranial Doppler 4.9 ± 2.3 years after the procedure in 55 patients; 20 (17%) had residual shunt and 35 (29%) had recurrent shunt. Neurological recurrences (13%) were equally distributed between the groups . In a study by Mirzaali et al, 301 patients underwent percutaneous PFO closure with 1 of 8 devices, with successful implantation in 99% of cases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Although small residual shunts were found in some patients during the occluder release, the position of the shunt was in the junction of the occluder and the deficient rim or in the occluder itself, and they did not need further medical treatment except for close observation. During the follow-up, the shunt wound became trivial or disappeared, due to the formation of endothelialization and the neointima fully closing, covering any residual shunting [ 30 , 31 ]. In our opinion, as long as the location of the occluder was firm and the left to right shunt decreased significantly, a small residual shunt can be ignored, and the corresponding clinical results were still good for the patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%