2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2008.09.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recurrence quantification analysis of surface electromyographic signal: Sensitivity to potentiation and neuromuscular fatigue

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
48
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
3
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is due to the nature of sEMG; in particular when peripheral fatigue sets in, the dynamics of the sEMG changes degrading the pattern recognition capabilities [2]. Recent research that investigates the peripherals of localized muscle fatigue [14,17] conforms to our findings. However, not much research has been conducted apart from our past research [7,8] to automate the process of predicting muscle fatigue by identifying and quantifying the Transition-to Fatigue (peripheral fatigue).…”
Section: Validation! Classificationsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…This is due to the nature of sEMG; in particular when peripheral fatigue sets in, the dynamics of the sEMG changes degrading the pattern recognition capabilities [2]. Recent research that investigates the peripherals of localized muscle fatigue [14,17] conforms to our findings. However, not much research has been conducted apart from our past research [7,8] to automate the process of predicting muscle fatigue by identifying and quantifying the Transition-to Fatigue (peripheral fatigue).…”
Section: Validation! Classificationsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…The authors speculated that these results can be related to a higher MU synchronization in people who train. Morana et al (2009), have used RQA to study muscle fatigue during a submaximal isometric exercise. They found that %DET was unchanged during the increase in power (due to potentiation), increased when the power decreased and was unchanged despite an increased central command, as reflected by an increased RMS/ M (RMS normalized to M-wave area).…”
Section: Recurrence Quantification Analysis (Rqa)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Refrence ID RMS (Basmajian & De Luca, 1985;Kumar & Mital, 1996) (Cohen, 1995;Raez et al, 2006;Ricamato et al, 1992) Gabor Transform (Gabor, 1946) Wavelet analysis (Kumar et al, 2003;Laterza & Olmo, 1997) Autogression analysis (Graupe & Cline, 1975;Kim et al, 2005;Tohru, 1992) Entropy (Jaynes, 1957;Sung et al, 2008) Recurrence Quantification Analysis (Filligoi et al, 2010;Morana et al, 2009) HOS (Hussain et al, 2008Kanosue et al, 1979) Composite Features (Boostani & Moradi, 2003;Hudgins et al, 1993;Phinyomark et al, 2009) Table 1. Signal analysis and feature characteristics…”
Section: Feature Extraction Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Morana et al (2009) recently used recurrence quantification analysis in a study of muscle fatigue and stated that this method can be used to detect peripheral muscle fatigue.…”
Section: Recurrence Quantification Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%