2019
DOI: 10.1167/19.1.17
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recurrence quantification analysis of eye movements during mental imagery

Abstract: Several studies demonstrated similarities of eye fixations during mental imagery and visual perception but-to our knowledge-the temporal characteristics of eye movements during imagery have not yet been considered in detail. To fill this gap, the same data is analyzed with conventional spatial techniques such as analysis of areas of interest (AOI), ScanMatch, and MultiMatch and with recurrence quantification analysis (RQA), a new way of analyzing gaze data by tracking refixations and their temporal dynamics. P… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
24
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
(81 reference statements)
3
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, repeated scanpaths (instead of single re-fixations) have also been shown to aid the rehearsal (Tremblay et al, 2006) and retrieval (Bochynska & Laeng, 2015) of visual-spatial information. In terms of RQA measures, recurrence and determinism became larger with increased working memory load (Meghanathan et al, 2019) and during mental imagery (imagined scene must be reactivated repeatedly in the absence of the actual display; Gurtner et al, 2019). In sum, previous literature also points to increased scanpath repetitiveness during MW.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 75%
“…Moreover, repeated scanpaths (instead of single re-fixations) have also been shown to aid the rehearsal (Tremblay et al, 2006) and retrieval (Bochynska & Laeng, 2015) of visual-spatial information. In terms of RQA measures, recurrence and determinism became larger with increased working memory load (Meghanathan et al, 2019) and during mental imagery (imagined scene must be reactivated repeatedly in the absence of the actual display; Gurtner et al, 2019). In sum, previous literature also points to increased scanpath repetitiveness during MW.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 75%
“…In fact, starting from the evidence that eye movements during visual imagery are related to what has been seen (Brandt and Stark, 1997), we showed that the nonlinear indexes of eye pattern significantly change according to the quality of the imagery performance and therefore this suggests that they contain information on the process of imagery. The higher REC and DET found in the BI group would likely reflect their bad working memory ability, which requires the recurrent fixation of the buttons on the screen to mentally reproduce the motor sequence (Gurtner et al, 2019). On the other hand, higher RQA parameters in the kinaesthetic modality than in the visual one can indicate facilitation for visual-motor imagery when visuospatial working memory is required.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…These findings have been assumed to reflect the visuospatial working memory processes by which mental images are generated and maintained in mind (Gurtner et al, 2019). Moreover, the large interindividual differences found in RQA measures during mental imagery has been related to the individual differences in working memory ability (Gurtner et al, 2019). Based on these previous studies, we have assumed that RQA could be used to find effective markers of motor imagery ability as well as of motor imagery modalities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Finally, compared to panel b, the recurrent fixations in panel c are closer to the major diagonal, meaning that refixations in panel c occur closer together in the fixation sequence. Therefore, the center of recurrence mass (CORM) is smaller in panel c than in panel b.From the recurrence plot, Anderson et al (2013) identified and described four recurrence measures which are briefly outlined here (also seeGurtner, Bischof, & Mast, 2019). First, the recurrence rate indicates the percentage of recurrent fixations for a given fixation sequence.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%