2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtos.2014.05.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recurrence or Re-emergence of Keratoconus – What is the Evidence Telling Us? Literature Review and Two Case Reports

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Bergmanson et al 12 suggested that this might be due to the presence of subclinical KC in the graft, which progressed and manifested after the surgery rather than an actual reoccurrence of KC. Nevertheless, this does not fully eliminate the possibility of peripheral involvement and migration from the host tissue to the donor’s graft.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bergmanson et al 12 suggested that this might be due to the presence of subclinical KC in the graft, which progressed and manifested after the surgery rather than an actual reoccurrence of KC. Nevertheless, this does not fully eliminate the possibility of peripheral involvement and migration from the host tissue to the donor’s graft.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The only available treatment for progressive keratoconus, corneal collagen crosslinking, is an effective method of slowing down or halting progression in keratoconus 5. However, this modality does not address the underlying biological processes that lead to disease pathogenesis, nor do other treatments aimed at visual rehabilitation, such as contact lens wear, intracorneal ring segments, or corneal tranplants 6. Currently, there is no small molecule intervention strategy for the treatment of keratoconus either to halt or reverse the progression of this disease.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Slit-scanning provides pachymetry values, but repeatability and posterior curvature mapping are inaccurate. Scheimpflug imaging is the preferred modality by most corneal surgeons because it provides precise corneal thickness and posterior elevation with good repeatability [ 18 ].…”
Section: Clinical Features and Visual Disturbancesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After PK for KC, postoperative corneal ectasia has been estimated to occur in 6% to 11% of the patients at 20 to 25 years after surgery [ 3 ]. The latency period is, on average, 19 years after PK, paralleling the natural evolution of keratoconus in adolescence [ 7 , 18 ]. According to these data, ectasia following PK is a rare condition that has been described as developing as early as seven years and usually more than ten years following suture removal and increasing up to 20–25-years after surgery.…”
Section: Frequency Of Corneal Ectasia After Keratoplastymentioning
confidence: 99%