2017
DOI: 10.1245/s10434-017-6106-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recurrence of Optimally Treated Malignant Peritoneal Mesothelioma with Cytoreduction and Heated Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy

Abstract: Absence of gross disease at the second operation was not statistically protective against recurrence compared with presence of quantifiable residual disease (Group B) that was effectively cytoreduced. Long-term disease surveillance is recommended, because recurrence continues years after treatment. Where a question of recurrence arises on surveillance, males may benefit from a higher degree of suspicion.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In mesothelioma and appendix peritoneal metastasis, CRS/HIPEC has significantly improved 5-year survival from less than 10% to 50% to 90%, and CRS/HIPEC is considered the standard of care for these tumor types. 10 , 31 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 Data continue to emerge that support adding HIPEC to CRS surgery in ovarian cancer, with the largest series (1051 patients) receiving CRS/HIPEC reporting a median survival of 73 months. 30 Also, 2 recent phase 3 randomized clinical trials investigating CRS/HIPEC in recurrent and primary stage III ovarian cancer demonstrated that HIPEC yielded a 2-fold overall survival benefit and 11-month overall survival benefit, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In mesothelioma and appendix peritoneal metastasis, CRS/HIPEC has significantly improved 5-year survival from less than 10% to 50% to 90%, and CRS/HIPEC is considered the standard of care for these tumor types. 10 , 31 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 Data continue to emerge that support adding HIPEC to CRS surgery in ovarian cancer, with the largest series (1051 patients) receiving CRS/HIPEC reporting a median survival of 73 months. 30 Also, 2 recent phase 3 randomized clinical trials investigating CRS/HIPEC in recurrent and primary stage III ovarian cancer demonstrated that HIPEC yielded a 2-fold overall survival benefit and 11-month overall survival benefit, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the last couple of years, improvements in palliative chemotherapy and cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) were able to achieve a survival benefit for a selected subset of patients with colorectal, ovarian, appendix peritoneal metastasis, mesothelioma, and pseudomyxoma peritonei. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17] After almost 20 years of HIPEC administration, the process of selecting appropriate patients underwent an outstanding evolution. Meanwhile, there are a variety of positive and negative prognostic factors (patient, tumor, and molecular pathological features) that influence the decision-making process to reduce postoperative morbidity and mortality rates and optimize the oncological benefit.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So wurden Patienten in einer Studie von Heller et al zwei bis drei Wochen nach CRS und HIPEC bei MPM wöchentlich insgesamt achtmal intraperitoneale Gaben von Cisplatin (100 mg/m 2 ) oder Cisplatin (50 mg/m 2 ) mit Gemcitabine (250 mg/m 2 ), abwechselnd mit Doxorubicin (25 mg), verabreicht. Die mediane Überlebenszeit nach der Operation war 6,65 Jahre, wobei das Erreichen einer CC ≤ 1-Situation ein signifikant positiver prädiktiver Faktor für das Überleben war [34]. Ob dieses Therapieverfahren Verankerung in Leitlinien findet, ist noch unklar.…”
Section: Therapieunclassified