2009
DOI: 10.1161/circulationaha.109.857987
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recurrence of Congenital Heart Defects in Families

Abstract: Specific CHDs showed highly variable but strong familial clustering in first-degree relatives, ranging from 3-fold to 80-fold compared with the population prevalence, whereas the crossover risks between dissimilar cases of CHD were weaker. Family history of any CHD among first-degree relatives accounted for a small proportion of CHD cases in the population.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

13
262
1
3

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 327 publications
(285 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
13
262
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…6 The CHD are considered as multifactorial defects, majority do not segregate in mendalian ratio, although familial aggregation present. 7 Most of the known cases of CHD are sporadic genetic variations, point mutations, duplication or deletion. 8 A large number of chromosomal abnormalities such as trisomy 21, 18,and 13 are associated with CHD in 5-8% cases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 The CHD are considered as multifactorial defects, majority do not segregate in mendalian ratio, although familial aggregation present. 7 Most of the known cases of CHD are sporadic genetic variations, point mutations, duplication or deletion. 8 A large number of chromosomal abnormalities such as trisomy 21, 18,and 13 are associated with CHD in 5-8% cases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3,4 According to epidemiological study, the impact of genetic factors seems to vary depending on CHD type with a much higher recurrence risk in CHD associated with heterotaxy than in the most common CHD such as atrial and ventricular septal defects (ASD and VSD, respectively). 5 Substituting a mean with an individual recurrence risk would be beneficial, because only mutation carriers are at high risk of recurrence, whereas noncarriers have a risk similar to the general population. Therefore, it is crucial to determine these genetic factors in order to improve genetic counseling by reassuring those who have no particular risk of recurrence and to give a much better recurrence risk estimation for mutation carriers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…с ВПС) было выявлено, что в сред-нем только у 2,2% детей с ВПС имелась отягощенность по ВПС у родственников первой линии родства. Однако наблюдалась выраженная вариабельность отношения рисков для разных ВПС: так, например, отягощенная наследственность по ВПС увеличивала риск формирова-ния ДМПП более чем втрое, обструкции выходного отдела правого желудочка -почти в 50 раз, а риск гетеротак-сии -почти в 80 раз [63].…”
Section: вопросы современной педиатрииunclassified