2009
DOI: 10.1007/s10014-009-0251-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recurrence and regrowth of benign meningiomas

Abstract: The World Health Organization (WHO) grading system for meningioma is helpful for predicting aggressive subtypes. However, even benign meningiomas sometimes show relatively rapid growth and may recur after total removal. We attempted to find histopathological features that would be valuable for predicting recurrence or regrowth of WHO grade I meningiomas. We investigated 135 benign meningiomas, of which 120 were totally removed (Simpson's grade I-III). The median follow-up period was 9.7 years (1-21 years). The… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

6
52
0
4

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
6
52
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The incidence of recurrence after total resection or residual tumor growth is reportedly 7-25%, even in tumors considered benign meningioma (grade I). 24) Therefore, the clinical course of benign meningioma is not necessarily favorable, 30) and many studies have investigated the prediction of postoperative recurrence, 16,18,22) particularly after total resection, usually based on the clinical or imaging findings of patients, but recently mainly based on the tumor growth potential, that is MIB-1 index. 14,15,17,18,31,32,34) MIB-1 index can be used as an index within a facility, but general comparison is difficult because no standard measurement method has been established, and the value markedly varies depending on the measurement site within a preparation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The incidence of recurrence after total resection or residual tumor growth is reportedly 7-25%, even in tumors considered benign meningioma (grade I). 24) Therefore, the clinical course of benign meningioma is not necessarily favorable, 30) and many studies have investigated the prediction of postoperative recurrence, 16,18,22) particularly after total resection, usually based on the clinical or imaging findings of patients, but recently mainly based on the tumor growth potential, that is MIB-1 index. 14,15,17,18,31,32,34) MIB-1 index can be used as an index within a facility, but general comparison is difficult because no standard measurement method has been established, and the value markedly varies depending on the measurement site within a preparation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…24) Therefore, the clinical course of benign meningioma is not necessarily favorable, 30) and many studies have investigated the prediction of postoperative recurrence, 16,18,22) particularly after total resection, usually based on the clinical or imaging findings of patients, but recently mainly based on the tumor growth potential, that is MIB-1 index. 14,15,17,18,31,32,34) MIB-1 index can be used as an index within a facility, but general comparison is difficult because no standard measurement method has been established, and the value markedly varies depending on the measurement site within a preparation. 18,19) Subsequently, the MIB-1 index considered to predict a high risk of recurrence or regrowth varies from 2% to 5%, 15,17,18,31) but the WHO classification considers that the mean MIB-1 index of grade I benign meningioma is generally 3.8%, showing the problem as a general predictor of regrowth in global criteria.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…(a): MRI brain (gado) axial (plain) section shows anterior parasagittal falx meningioma (b): Post-operative CT shows totally removed remains elusive but female predominance suggests a role for hormonally mediated risk factors (Claus et al, 2012). Trauma, ionizing radiation, brain injury, smoking, chronic viral infection, chromosomal abnormalities are proposed to be other predisposing factors (Phillips et al, 2005;Nakasu et al, 2009). We could not demonstrate spesific etiological agents in our cases which could be related to the minority of our study group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%