2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.earscirev.2014.05.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recumbent folds: Key structural elements in orogenic belts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 102 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…8, in which the attitudes of the axial planes of folds originated in layers with initial dip direction of 30°and several dips are plotted. For higher values of the dip direction, the formation of recumbent folds is more difficult (Bastida et al, 2014). The axial planes pass through a stage of low dip that in some cases would give rise to recumbent folds.…”
Section: Forward Modeling: Case Of Recumbent Foldsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…8, in which the attitudes of the axial planes of folds originated in layers with initial dip direction of 30°and several dips are plotted. For higher values of the dip direction, the formation of recumbent folds is more difficult (Bastida et al, 2014). The axial planes pass through a stage of low dip that in some cases would give rise to recumbent folds.…”
Section: Forward Modeling: Case Of Recumbent Foldsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Simple shear and coaxial strain seem to be the most important types of whole-rock strain involved in the development of these folds (Bastida et al, 2014).…”
Section: Forward Modeling: Case Of Recumbent Foldsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are several major differences that Figure 14. Comparison between finite strain from the Morcles nappe (taken from Bastida et al, 2014 showing a recoloured version of the synthetic cross section with strain ellipses from pressure shadows after Casey and Dietrich, 1997, including green strain ellipses from Ramsay and Huber, 1987, the cross section is modified from Dietrich and Casey, 1989) and selected finite strain ellipses from model A.G-1 and model D.G-1.…”
Section: Comparison With the Helvetic Nappe Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their identification depends upon the preservation of structural elements that are considered characteristic of nappes (e.g. Ramsay 1981;Bastida et al 2014). These include (but are not limited to) synformal anticlines and antiformal synclines along the overturned lower limb of a nappe, as well as asymmetric, mesoscopic-scale, parasitic folds that verge in the opposite direction of nappe emplacement and are characterised by thinned upper and lower limbs that connect through a steeply-dipping and structurally thickened short limb.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%