2020
DOI: 10.1111/ajo.13145
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rectal disc resection improves stool frequency in patients with deep infiltrating endometriosis: A prospective study

Abstract: Background: Gastrointestinal symptoms occur with deeply infiltrating endometriosis (DIE) of the rectum. Aims:To explore the medium-term gastrointestinal functional outcomes after rectal disc resection for endometriosis. Methods:All women undergoing laparoscopy for stage IV endometriosis at a tertiary referral hospital between November 2016 and January 2018 and had evidence of DIE of the rectum were included. Low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) score was measured using a validated questionnaire.Results: Thir… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a recent meta‐analysis 19 the prevalence of major LARS after low rectum resection was as high as 41% among patients treated for colorectal cancer. Although a lot is known about the incidence of LARS after colorectal cancer surgery, evidence concerning the use of LARS after colorectal resection for DE on the basis of symptoms and quality of life is scarce, especially for a high‐risk patient group with low rectal resections resulting in anastomotic lines within 7 cm from the anus 13,20,21 . Hence, the aim of the present work was to compare two surgical approaches (LTADE and NVSSR) for full‐thickness excision of rectal DE with an anastomotic height ≤7 cm distance from the anal verge with regards to the incidence of LARS, postoperative outcomes, and fertility results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a recent meta‐analysis 19 the prevalence of major LARS after low rectum resection was as high as 41% among patients treated for colorectal cancer. Although a lot is known about the incidence of LARS after colorectal cancer surgery, evidence concerning the use of LARS after colorectal resection for DE on the basis of symptoms and quality of life is scarce, especially for a high‐risk patient group with low rectal resections resulting in anastomotic lines within 7 cm from the anus 13,20,21 . Hence, the aim of the present work was to compare two surgical approaches (LTADE and NVSSR) for full‐thickness excision of rectal DE with an anastomotic height ≤7 cm distance from the anal verge with regards to the incidence of LARS, postoperative outcomes, and fertility results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other positive aspects reported by participants who showed improvement in pain after surgery were increased willingness to carry out daily activities, increased physical activity, better performance at work and improved sexual intercourse. A study ( 26 ) aimed to evaluate pelvic pain and quality of life before and after videolaparoscopy for deep endometriosis, also being significant improvement in the activities mentioned above was observed 1 year after surgery. It was not possible to assess improvement in infertility due to the post-surgery time of 6 months, at which point patients complaining of infertility would begin new attempts to get pregnant.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%