2018
DOI: 10.1007/s13244-018-0606-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rectal cancer MRI: protocols, signs and future perspectives radiologists should consider in everyday clinical practice

Abstract: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) allows to non-invasively evaluate rectal cancer staging and to assess the presence of “prognostic signs” such as the distance from the anorectal junction, the mesorectal fascia infiltration and the extramural vascular invasion. Moreover, MRI plays a crucial role in the assessment of treatment response after chemo-radiation therapy, especially considering the growing interest in the new conservative policy (wait and see, minimally invasive surgery). We present a practical overvi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
(2 reference statements)
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…High-field-strength MRI provides fast image acquisition, high spatial resolution, and high signalto-noise ratio, improving the visibility of the rectal wall (25). Ideally, higher field strengths (eg, 1.5 T or 3.0 T) are preferred, with some studies demonstrating similar accuracies for staging for both (26)(27)(28). While 1.5 T is the most widely available and used, 3.0 T may improve spatial resolution, with an increase of the signal-to-noise ratio, and may be preferable to 1.5 T. However, some experts cite greater magnetic susceptibility artifact at 3.0 T, which may occur during DWI, as a potential disadvantage (29,30).…”
Section: Dosmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…High-field-strength MRI provides fast image acquisition, high spatial resolution, and high signalto-noise ratio, improving the visibility of the rectal wall (25). Ideally, higher field strengths (eg, 1.5 T or 3.0 T) are preferred, with some studies demonstrating similar accuracies for staging for both (26)(27)(28). While 1.5 T is the most widely available and used, 3.0 T may improve spatial resolution, with an increase of the signal-to-noise ratio, and may be preferable to 1.5 T. However, some experts cite greater magnetic susceptibility artifact at 3.0 T, which may occur during DWI, as a potential disadvantage (29,30).…”
Section: Dosmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To overcome this limitation, functional parameters to evaluate tissue viability obtained by position emission tomography, dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI, and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) are being assessed. The practice of merging DWI into a standard MRI protocol is increasing because of the ability of DWI to detect and characterize lesions, which enhances its capability in the assessment of the treatment response, 610 thus increasing clinical confidence and decreasing false positives. 11,12 DWI assessment may be performed qualitatively or quantitatively with a mono-exponential analysis [apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) map] or bi-exponential analysis [intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) model] or with diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI) based on a kurtosis model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thanks to their superparamagnetic properties, SPION proved to be an excellent contrast for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), one of the leading techniques in cancer diagnostics [1,2,3]. Recently, SPION have also gained attention due to their ability to induce magnetic hyperthermia (MHT) [4]. When an external alternating magnetic field of specific frequency is applied, it causes SPION to heat.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%