2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.apnr.2005.04.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recruitment and retention in a longitudinal palliative care study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
40
0
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
2
40
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, our nonsignificant findings must be interpreted with caution. However, several other authors have pointed out the recruitment problems of patients and PCGs in the palliative phase, and therefore low sample size could be expected [21,26,30,31].…”
Section: Strengths and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, our nonsignificant findings must be interpreted with caution. However, several other authors have pointed out the recruitment problems of patients and PCGs in the palliative phase, and therefore low sample size could be expected [21,26,30,31].…”
Section: Strengths and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20,21 Participation in research may provide bereaved persons with the opportunity to tell their story to an empathic listener interested in the details of their experience, a situation that may not happen often in every-day life. 6,18,20,22 Emanuel et al 20 reported that 73% of bereaved caregivers found participation in an interview about their loved one's death to cause little to no distress and that 41% found the interview helpful.…”
Section: Minimizing Risksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recognized limitations of the present study include small sample size and recruitment and attrition issues, well-documented and challenging problems in palliative care research (McMillan & Mahon, 1994;Sherman et al, 2005;Sherman et al, 2007). Patient death was by far the most frequent reason for withdrawal from the study prior to one-month data collection, and we suggest more frequent assessment in future research.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%