Recruiting and retaining general practitioners in rural practice: systematic review and meta‐analysis of rural pipeline effects

Abstract

Objective To synthesise quantitative data on the effects of rural background and experience in rural areas during medical training on the likelihood of general practitioners practising and remaining in rural areas. Study design Systematic review and meta‐analysis of the effects of rural pipeline factors (rural background; rural clinical and education experience during undergraduate and postgraduate/vocational training) on likelihood of later general practice in rural areas. Data sources MEDLINE (Ovid), EMBASE, Informit Health Collection, and ERIC electronic database records published to September 2018; bibliographies of retrieved articles; grey literature. Data synthesis Of 6709 publications identified by our search, 27 observational studies were eligible for inclusion in our systematic review; when appropriate, data were pooled in random effects models for meta‐analysis. Study quality, assessed with the Newcastle–Ottawa scale, was very good or good for 24 studies, satisfactory for two, and unsatisfactory for one. Meta‐analysis indicated that GPs practising in rural communities was significantly associated with having a rural background (odds ratio [OR], 2.71; 95% CI, 2.12–3.46; ten studies) and with rural clinical experience during undergraduate (OR, 1.75; 95% CI, 1.48–2.08; five studies) and postgraduate training (OR, 4.57; 95% CI, 2.80–7.46; eight studies). Conclusion GPs with rural backgrounds or rural experience during undergraduate or postgraduate medical training are more likely to practise in rural areas. The effects of multiple rural pipeline factors may be cumulative, and the duration of an experience influences the likelihood of a GP commencing and remaining in rural general practice. These findings could inform government‐led initiatives to support an adequate rural GP workforce. Protocol registration PROSPERO, CRD42017074943 (updated 1 February 2018).

Being the Pillar for Children with Rare Diseases—A Systematic Review on Parental Quality of Life

“…Cross-sectional studies could score a maximum of four points regarding selection, two points for comparability, and two points for outcome. Based on the overall score of each study, the quality was categorized as: very good (7–8 points), good (5–6 points), satisfactory (4 points), or unsatisfactory (0–3 points), according to the classification adopted by Ogden et al, 2020 [ 27 ]. Cohort studies could score a maximum of four points regarding selection, two points for comparability, and three points for outcome.…”

Nurse practitioner led model of after-hours emergency care in an Australian rural urgent care Centre: health service stakeholder perceptions

“…Although the role was originally intended for underserviced areas of primary and community health, most NPs practice within hospital acute care sectors [ 22 ]. The NP-led model offers a logical response to the pressures of unmet health service need in rural areas [ 48 ].…”

The change from UMAT to UCAT for undergraduate medical school applicants: impact on selection outcomes

“…The UCAT may limit the selection of applicants from outside major cities and from low socio‐economic status areas unless additional opportunities are provided by specific pathways and quotas. Quotas for rural students have been justified by the argument that they are more likely to later practise in underserviced rural areas 18,19 . As women are more likely to choose careers in underserviced areas and in specialities with workforce shortages, such as general practice, 20‐22 a sex quota may also be appropriate 23 …”

“…Quotas for rural students have been justified by the argument that they are more likely to later practise in underserviced rural areas. 18,19 As women are more likely to choose careers in underserviced areas and in specialities with workforce shortages, such as general practice, [20][21][22] a sex quota may also be appropriate. 23 In Australia, large numbers of applicants for undergraduate medical programs believe they need commercial coaching to be competitive.…”