Despite comprising a large and increasing proportion of the United
States population—about 14.7%, according to March 2006 Census Bureau
estimates—Latinos continue to be severely underrepresented in
political science, and today comprise less than 2% of the academy
(Census Bureau 2006; Michelson 2007). Increased recent attention to the
issues of recruitment and retention of Latino political scientists
by professional associations such as the American Political Science
Association (APSA) notwithstanding, the number of Latino scholars in
the field continues to lag behind that of other racial and ethnic
groups. But just where in the pipeline does the problem exist? Are
not enough Latinos being recruited for graduate study? Are Latinos
being successfully recruited but then not finishing their degrees?
Or is the leak occurring later in scholars' careers, perhaps between
graduation and tenure? Avalos (1991) noted
that Latinas were particularly underrepresented, with few women
entering or completing Ph.D. programs. More than 16 years later,
does a gender gap persist among Latino political scientists? Do
leaks in the pipeline differ for Latinos and Latinas? These are the
questions that drive this research. An
earlier version of this research was presented at the 2007
Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association. We
would like to thank Maria Chavez, Patricia Jamarillo, Lisa
García Bedolla, Celeste Montoya, Luis Fraga, Anna Sampaio, and
Juan Carlos Huerta for their helpful comments, as well as
Michael Jackson and Lilly Montalvo for their research
assistance. We are also indebted to all of the respondents for
their cooperation. All errors, of course, remain our
own.