2018
DOI: 10.1093/infdis/jiy484
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recrudescence, Reinfection, or Relapse? A More Rigorous Framework to Assess Chloroquine Efficacy forPlasmodium vivaxMalaria

Abstract: No evidence of chloroquine resistance were observed. Our data suggest that P. vivax antimalarial drug resistance is likely overestimated and that the current guidelines for clinical drug studies in vivax malaria need to be revised.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
26
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We also included in our analysis, 16 P . vivax isolates collected from recurrences occurring in the 2-months follow up after a standard 3-day course of chloroquine (30 mg/kg) in patients relocated in a non-transmission area [ 45 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also included in our analysis, 16 P . vivax isolates collected from recurrences occurring in the 2-months follow up after a standard 3-day course of chloroquine (30 mg/kg) in patients relocated in a non-transmission area [ 45 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the primary infection could be A1B3 and A2B4, and the recurrence could be A1B4 and A2B3). Parasites that are siblings, and also the infections that they cause, could be deemed homologous (as in [6]), heterologous (as in [26,28]), or referred to separately (as in [18,65,83]).…”
Section: Terminology: Homologous and Heterologousmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…primaquine, the only radical cure currently available, and tafenoquine, approved in some countries but yet to be deployed in endemic areas) in populations at continued risk of infection will be biased downwards by the background transmission rate. Finally, the inability to distinguish between relapse and recrudescence (recurrence of the blood-stage infection as result of blood-stage treatment failure) means that it is difficult to estimate the curative efficacy of a blood-stage treatment in endemic areas [28]. This contrasts with Plasmodium falciparum malaria where standardised genotyping is used effectively to distinguish recrudescence from reinfection, allowing for the adjustment of efficacy estimates in populations at continued risk of reinfection [29-31].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Distinguishing relapses from reinfections is complex, since hypnozoites causing a relapse may be genetically different from the parasites that caused the initial infection [ 74 ]. Recent studies using whole genome sequencing data have demonstrated the utility of molecular data to identify recurrent infections that are genetically different from day-zero parasites, but appear to be related, sharing identity by descent [ 75 , 76 ]. Pairs of day-zero and recurrent parasites that are genetically related are more likely to have derived from the same mosquito bite than from different inoculations (as in a reinfection) and are, therefore, more likely to represent relapse rather than re-infection events.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%