2014
DOI: 10.1002/clen.201300723
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recovery of Zn(II) and Ni(II) Binary from Wastewater Using Integrated Biosorption and Electrodeposition

Abstract: Research Article Recovery of Zn(II) and Ni(II) Binary from Wastewater Using Integrated Biosorption and ElectrodepositionThe present study aimed to obtain best operational conditions for biosorption of Zn(II) and Ni(II) binary metal solution in a fixed bed packed with wheat straw as biosorbent. The effects of bed depths, liquid flow rates and mixture metal concentrations on biosorption service time were investigated. The results showed that breakthrough service time of the biosorption columns (C b ¼ 2 mg/L Zn a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 26 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some studies have also dealt with the retention of pollutants on wheat straw, although under conditions different from those of the present work. These studies, collectively, have used carbonized wheat straw to remove up to 99.9% Cr(VI) at pH 1 [43], used neuro-fuzzy techniques to predict the removal capacity of Cu(II) and Cr(VI) from aqueous solutions by wheat straw [44], investigated Ni(II) and Zn(II) bio-sorption potential of sulfuric-acid-treated wheat straw by means of column experiments [45], reviewed the efficacy of wheat straw as a bio-sorbent for As removal (finding up to 3.8 mg·g −1 in modified straw) [46], and reviewed the bio-sorption of heavy metals on wheat-straw-based materials [47], finding up to 87.8% Cr(VI) removal at pH 2, and up to 12.0 mg·g −1 Ni removal at pH 5. This means that other alternatives to the use of complementary bio-sorbents could be taken into account in order to increase pollutants removal, when working conditions can be safe and effectively changed in this way.…”
Section: Implications Of the Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies have also dealt with the retention of pollutants on wheat straw, although under conditions different from those of the present work. These studies, collectively, have used carbonized wheat straw to remove up to 99.9% Cr(VI) at pH 1 [43], used neuro-fuzzy techniques to predict the removal capacity of Cu(II) and Cr(VI) from aqueous solutions by wheat straw [44], investigated Ni(II) and Zn(II) bio-sorption potential of sulfuric-acid-treated wheat straw by means of column experiments [45], reviewed the efficacy of wheat straw as a bio-sorbent for As removal (finding up to 3.8 mg·g −1 in modified straw) [46], and reviewed the bio-sorption of heavy metals on wheat-straw-based materials [47], finding up to 87.8% Cr(VI) removal at pH 2, and up to 12.0 mg·g −1 Ni removal at pH 5. This means that other alternatives to the use of complementary bio-sorbents could be taken into account in order to increase pollutants removal, when working conditions can be safe and effectively changed in this way.…”
Section: Implications Of the Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%