2015
DOI: 10.3109/01658107.2014.998771
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recovery of Visual Field Defect via Corpus Callosum in a Patient with Cerebral Infarct

Abstract: Recovery mechanism of visual field defect in stroke patients has not been clearly elucidated. In this study, we report on a patient with a cerebral infarct who showed recovery of visual field defect via the corpus callosum, using diffusion tensor tractography (DTT) for optic radiation (OR). A 57-year-old male patient underwent conservative management for a cerebral infarct in the subcortical white matter of the right temporal lobe. Left homonymous hemianopsia was detected on the 2-week Humphrey visual field te… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
(20 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[16][17][18] Functional neuroimaging has also proved to be a powerful tool for studying poststroke motor and language recovery. In fact, previous studies have detected similar types of plastic changes in the visual, motor, and language systems: (1) increased perilesional activation, 7,16,20 (2) perilesional cortical reorganization, 18,[21][22][23] (3) strengthening of existing corticocortical connections, [24][25][26][27][28] and (4) recruitment of distant brain regions. 16,[29][30][31][32][33] Given these similarities, a greater understanding of poststroke plastic changes in the visual pathway may shed light on recovery in the motor and language domains.…”
Section: The Functional Anatomy Of the Visual System Offers Several Amentioning
confidence: 73%
“…[16][17][18] Functional neuroimaging has also proved to be a powerful tool for studying poststroke motor and language recovery. In fact, previous studies have detected similar types of plastic changes in the visual, motor, and language systems: (1) increased perilesional activation, 7,16,20 (2) perilesional cortical reorganization, 18,[21][22][23] (3) strengthening of existing corticocortical connections, [24][25][26][27][28] and (4) recruitment of distant brain regions. 16,[29][30][31][32][33] Given these similarities, a greater understanding of poststroke plastic changes in the visual pathway may shed light on recovery in the motor and language domains.…”
Section: The Functional Anatomy Of the Visual System Offers Several Amentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Among those parameters, increments in FA or FV values and/or a decrement in the ADC value on follow-up DTI scans of an injured OR suggest that the injured OR is undergoing recovery. Three methods employed to determine the presence of recovery of an injured OR have been described in previous studies: (1) detection of visual changes on the color maps of follow-up DTIs; (2) detection of changes in the FA value measured in a specific region of interest (ROI) of an injured OR; and (3) detection of changes in the FN value and in three-dimensionally reconstructed configurations on follow-up DTTs [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24] (Figure 2). However, the method used to detect changes to an injured OR visually on DTI color maps can be subjective, and the ROI-based method can yield false results due to interanalyzer variability in the assigning of ROI location [27].…”
Section: Diffusion Tensor Imaging Of the Optic Radiationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, on 2-week postonset DTT, the left OR was shown to be connected to the transcallosal fibers, and on 11month DTT, these transcallosal fibers appeared to have elongated to the right primary visual cortex via the right posterior OR. The authors suggested that the visual field defect in this patient had recovered via the recovery of the OR injury by way of the transcallosal fibers of the splenium of the corpus callosum [21,35]. However, this was a single case report and DTT for the OR was reconstructed using a deterministic algorithm [27][28][29][30].…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%
See 2 more Smart Citations