2014
DOI: 10.1111/1556-4029.12649
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recovery of Spray Paint Traces from Clothing by Beating

Abstract: Manual recovery of spray paints from textiles using a microscope, the routine method in many laboratories, is often laborious. Beating the clothing with a plastic rod, the routine method used for recovery of glass traces within the authors' laboratory, is proposed as an alternative. The efficiency of the method was evaluated by spray tests with fluorescent paint. In these tests, paint particles in the acquired debris samples, as well as those remaining on the textiles, were investigated. The results show that … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To date, most of the TPPR experimental work reported has focused on textile fibers [5][6][7][10][11][12][13][14] and glass [8,9,[15][16][17]. Other authors have since investigated traditional trace evidence types like hair [18][19][20], paint [21][22][23][24][25], botanical and biological material [26][27][28][29][30][31][32],…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To date, most of the TPPR experimental work reported has focused on textile fibers [5][6][7][10][11][12][13][14] and glass [8,9,[15][16][17]. Other authors have since investigated traditional trace evidence types like hair [18][19][20], paint [21][22][23][24][25], botanical and biological material [26][27][28][29][30][31][32],…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, most of the TPPR experimental work reported has focused on textile fibers [5–7,10–14] and glass [8,9,15–17]. Other authors have since investigated traditional trace evidence types like hair [18–20], paint [21–25], botanical and biological material [26–32], explosive [33–35] and gunshot residues (GSR) [36–41], and soil [42–46], as well as other less commonly encountered traces including glitter [47], fragrances [48–50], lipsticks [51], petrol [52], and polyurethane foam [53]. While valuable, such research tends to be very material‐dependent, introducing specific parameters and interpretations that may have actually impeded the recognition of underlying foundational factors that could apply to most material types.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%