2007 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing 2007
DOI: 10.1109/icip.2007.4379860
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recovery of Seismic Events by Time-Frequency Peak Filtering

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The WL of the PWVD must be chosen such that the signal IF is as close to linear as possible while not sacrificing frequency resolution. Equation (8) gives the empirical maximum WL as a function of the dominant frequency f d and the sampling frequency f s in case of the worst bias of 5% [9], [12] 1…”
Section: Tfpf Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The WL of the PWVD must be chosen such that the signal IF is as close to linear as possible while not sacrificing frequency resolution. Equation (8) gives the empirical maximum WL as a function of the dominant frequency f d and the sampling frequency f s in case of the worst bias of 5% [9], [12] 1…”
Section: Tfpf Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, most of the practical signals are nonlinear and nonstationary, such as seismic signals; thus, we use a windowed version of WVD, called pseudo-WVD (PWVD), to satisfy the local linearity of signals. The formula of PWVD is as follows [5]:…”
Section: Principles Of Conventional Tfpfmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Time-frequency peak filtering (TFPF) is an effective way to remove the random noise from the seismic record with low SNR [5]- [8]. However, there are two shortcomings in con- Manuscript ventional TFPF: 1) It uses a fixed window length (WL).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can be shown that the empirical maximum window length (WL) as a function of the dominant frequency fd and the sampling frequency fs in the case of the worst bias of 5% (Lin et al . ) is 1WL0.384fsfd.…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%