1991
DOI: 10.1016/0278-2391(91)90054-p
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recovery of mandibular mobility following orthognathic surgery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
22
0
5

Year Published

1994
1994
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
22
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Aragon et al 91 reported that protrusive movement and lateral excursion of the mandible did not recover to the preoperative levels after a sagittal split osteotomy was performed to advance the mandible. Boyd et al 92 These studies suggested that changing the condylar position could improve TMJ function after IVRO. If accurate condylar repositioning in SSRO is performed on the deviation side of the mandibular asymmetry with a TMJ that has an anteriorly displaced disc, improvement in TMJ function will not be expected.…”
Section: Post-operative Chewing Path and Condylar Pathmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aragon et al 91 reported that protrusive movement and lateral excursion of the mandible did not recover to the preoperative levels after a sagittal split osteotomy was performed to advance the mandible. Boyd et al 92 These studies suggested that changing the condylar position could improve TMJ function after IVRO. If accurate condylar repositioning in SSRO is performed on the deviation side of the mandibular asymmetry with a TMJ that has an anteriorly displaced disc, improvement in TMJ function will not be expected.…”
Section: Post-operative Chewing Path and Condylar Pathmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a previous study by Boyd et al 8 a significant reduction in MMO occurred immediately after surgery in the Le Fort I osteotomy and SSRO groups and at lease of fixation in the IVRO group. They stated that significant differences in the recovery patterns of mandibular mobility exist between surgical procedures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…This study demonstrated that there were no significant differences among the four patient groups, suggesting that the addition of Le Fort I osteotomy does not affect the recovery of MMO, as mentioned previously. 8 Previous studies indicate that intrinsic differences exist between SSRO and IVRO patients when dental fixation is used without physiotherapy, with IVRO patients recovering a larger percentage of their preoperative MMO. 3,4 It was considered that the difference in the recovery of MMO between the SSRO and IVRO groups depended on the period of MMF after surgery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations