2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.04.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recovery of lithium and cobalt from spent lithium ion batteries (LIBs) using organic acids as leaching reagents: A review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
121
0
8

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 321 publications
(130 citation statements)
references
References 205 publications
1
121
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…The rapid increase in the production of LIBs puts pressure on the environment and natural resources, particularly Li and Co ones. In fact, 35% and 25% of the global Li and Co production, respectively, are used for manufacturing LIBs [9]. Recycling LIBs lessens the demand for raw material, as reported by Gaines et al, and thus could render LIB manufacturing more sustainable [10].…”
Section: Recycling As Sustainable Solution For Lib Waste Managementmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The rapid increase in the production of LIBs puts pressure on the environment and natural resources, particularly Li and Co ones. In fact, 35% and 25% of the global Li and Co production, respectively, are used for manufacturing LIBs [9]. Recycling LIBs lessens the demand for raw material, as reported by Gaines et al, and thus could render LIB manufacturing more sustainable [10].…”
Section: Recycling As Sustainable Solution For Lib Waste Managementmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…However, such advantages may be argued depending on flowsheet complexity, reagent schemes, effluent toxicity, and water consumption. Several review papers have described hydrometallurgical recycling processes [4,6,9,11,17,40,42,52,67,[113][114][115]. Most of these review papers covered only the recycling of transition metal oxide LIBs and rarely mentioned the recycling of LFP batteries except for the review published by Wang et al, which only described process related to LFP recycling [116].…”
Section: Hydrometallurgical Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[1][2][3][4] The rising demand for EV and the low accessibility to raw materials are threatening the LIBs production and urge the instant necessity of recycling to employ the valuable materials. [1,2,[16][17][18]20,22,[33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42] In this review, we discuss first time in detail about the reutilization of spent LIBs materials/recovered materials in various fields including LIB, supercapacitors, oxygen evolution reaction (OER), adsorption, photocatalytic studies, etc. [27,28] In chemical process, researchers mostly prefer hydrometallurgical route for the recycling of spent LIBs attributable to the great advantages such as low energy conditions, minimization of waste water, and higher percentage recovery of metals with high purity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…104 GWh (with 8 years first life and 5 years second life for 70% of batteries), corresponding to ca. 7.5 kt Li and 12 kt Co. 3,4 Spent LIBs can be treated as valuable secondary sources of metals because of their large amounts of Li, Co, Ni, Mn, Cu, Al, and Fe, 5,6 which are present in higher concentration than in natural primary ores. 7 Typically, a spent Li-ion battery contains 5-20 wt.% Co, 5-7 wt.% Li, 5-7 wt.% Ni, 15 wt.% organics, and 7 wt.% plastics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%