Coastal Shellfish — A Sustainable Resource 2001
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-010-0434-3_3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recovery of intertidal mussel beds in the Waddensea: use of habitat maps in the management of the fishery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sensitivity to human activities: Mussel beds have declined in European waters, mainly due to overexploitation (Dankers et al, 2001). The probable role of marine pollution has also been stressed (Herlyn & Millat, 2000).…”
Section: Mussel Beds On Circalittoral Rock (Eunis A424)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sensitivity to human activities: Mussel beds have declined in European waters, mainly due to overexploitation (Dankers et al, 2001). The probable role of marine pollution has also been stressed (Herlyn & Millat, 2000).…”
Section: Mussel Beds On Circalittoral Rock (Eunis A424)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, in the Wadden Sea where natural or human pressure occurred (Dankers et al, 2001) there are records of extraordinary recoveries because of a good reproduction year which caused an increase from 170 ha to 1280 ha in one year (Dankers et al, 1999in Dankers et al, 2001. It is therefore expected that a rapid increase in the cover percentage of mussel beds occur should access to these rocky shores remain difficult.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the »5 km 2 Königshafen area (on the Island of Sylt, German Wadden Sea), Nehls et al (1997) state 2.5%. For the total of four political parts of the international Wadden Sea (Netherlands, Lower-Saxony, SchleswigHolstein, and Denmark), each covering around 10 3 km 2 of tidal Xats, Dankers et al (2001) list total areas of mussel beds. Before 1980, mussel beds usually covered 1-3% of the tidal Xats, but these proportions declined to »0.5% (or even less in some years) in later years.…”
Section: Long-term Variability In Productionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In some years, this Wshery severely aVected natural mussel beds (Smit et al 1998;Dankers et al 2004). Because re-appearance of new intertidal beds proved to be a slow process (Dankers et al 2001(Dankers et al , 2004, Wshery for shellWsh is by now restricted to subtidal areas. Particularly in the western half of the Dutch Wadden Sea, mussel stocks on tidal Xats remained low for the last 15 years (Steenbergen et al 2005) and nowadays mussel beds are few there (see map 1 in Goudswaard et al (2006)).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%