2008
DOI: 10.1039/b716608g
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recovery of Francisella tularensis from soil samples by filtration and detection by real-time PCR and cELISA

Abstract: The aim of this study was to develop a specific and highly sensitive method able to detect very low concentrations of Francisella tularensis in soil samples by real-time PCR (qPCR) with SYBR Green I. tul4 gene, which encodes the 17-kDa protein (TUL4) in F. tularensis strains, was amplified using a LightCycler (LC) device. We achieved a detection limit of 0.69 fg of genomic DNA from F. tularensis subp. holarctica live vaccine strain (LVS), corresponding to a value less than 3.4 genome equivalents per reaction. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…tularensis (Ftt) was developed as a potential biological weapon, and has since been categorized as a Tier 1 select agent in the USA [4]. Ftt is readily found in the environment as both a free-living and arthropodtransmitted pathogen [5,6]. Thus, this bacterium also represents a persistent public health threat in both developed and underdeveloped areas of the world [7,8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…tularensis (Ftt) was developed as a potential biological weapon, and has since been categorized as a Tier 1 select agent in the USA [4]. Ftt is readily found in the environment as both a free-living and arthropodtransmitted pathogen [5,6]. Thus, this bacterium also represents a persistent public health threat in both developed and underdeveloped areas of the world [7,8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, qPCR has been used to detect and quantify various bacteria species present in different types of samples (Coelho et al, 2009;Jung et al, 2010;Lacava et al, 2006;Ruppel et al, 2006;Sellek et al, 2008;Timmusk et al, 2009;Trabelsi et al, 2009) and therefore may represent an alternative means for quantifying G. diazotrophicus.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…QPCR has been applied to quantify bacteria directly in pure culture, soil samples (Sellek et al, 2008;Trabelsi et al, 2009) and plant tissues (Lacava et al, 2006;Ruppel et al, 2006;Trabelsi et al, 2009) using either 16S rRNA (Jung et al, 2010), nifH gene (Coelho et al, 2009) or species-specific sequences (Jung et al, 2010;Timmusk et al, 2009). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of soil samples, the lowest limit of detection reached only 20 CFU per 1 g of soil (Whitehouse & Hottel, 2006). The real-time PCR based on SYBR Green I and tul4 gene for F. tularensis LVS achieved limit of detection of 0.69 fg of genomic DNA (Sellek et al, 2008). An extensive review of detection methods was published recently (Pohanka et al, 2008).…”
Section: Assay Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%