2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2008.03.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recovery of Campylobacter jejuni from surfaces of poultry slaughterhouses after cleaning and disinfection procedures: Analysis of a potential source of carcass contamination

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
50
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
4
50
1
Order By: Relevance
“…isolated from broiler slaughterhouses. This observation suggests that such genotypes may be particularly adapted to survive cleaning and disinfection stress in poultry slaughterhouses and may contaminate the carcasses during processing (Peyrat et al 2008). Additionally, our results showed that Campylobacter may easily contaminate poultry carcasses at slaughter process.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…isolated from broiler slaughterhouses. This observation suggests that such genotypes may be particularly adapted to survive cleaning and disinfection stress in poultry slaughterhouses and may contaminate the carcasses during processing (Peyrat et al 2008). Additionally, our results showed that Campylobacter may easily contaminate poultry carcasses at slaughter process.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…Campylobacter-colonized flocks contaminate the abattoir environment upon entering the room and as a consequence Campylobacter can be isolated at all stages of the processing line (Ellerbroek et al 2010). C. jejuni is able to survive overnight on these processing equipment surfaces, even after cleaning and disinfection (Peyrat et al 2008). Therefore, surviving strains might possibly be a source of poultry carcass contamination of subsequent flocks, probably by intestinal contents of previously processed Campylobacter-colonized flocks (Newell et al 2001, Miwa et al 2003.…”
Section: Carcass Contaminationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many of these concerns stem from practices common to IFAP, such as the continued use of arsenical drugs in poultry production (110), the use of hormones in beef and dairy production, and the widespread administration of antimicrobials (see the section entitled Antimicrobial Resistance). Animal slaughtering and meat-processing facilities present further multiple opportunities for microbial cross-contamination (77,119), which are heightened by the volume of carcasses and the speed at which they are processed.…”
Section: Microbial and Chemical Contaminationmentioning
confidence: 99%