2016
DOI: 10.1080/07347324.2016.1256718
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recovery Networks and Community Connections: Identifying Connection Needs and Community Linkage Opportunities in Early Recovery Populations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
42
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
3
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In line with our hypothesis, we found evidence that the negative impact of self-stigma on psychological well-being was mediated by social identification with the online recovery group. This finding is consistent with the view that social identification has a positive impact on psychological well-being because it serves as a psychological basis for individuals to achieve longterm identity change and equips individuals with adaptive coping behaviours and social support and guidance that enable them to manage the negative effects of self-stigma (Albery & Frings, 2016;Best et al, 2017;Bliuc, Best, Beckwith, & Iqbal, 2017;Chou et al, 2013, Frings & Albery, 2015. However, the results of our analysis have paradoxically linked social identification to both psychological well-being and lesser self-efficacy.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In line with our hypothesis, we found evidence that the negative impact of self-stigma on psychological well-being was mediated by social identification with the online recovery group. This finding is consistent with the view that social identification has a positive impact on psychological well-being because it serves as a psychological basis for individuals to achieve longterm identity change and equips individuals with adaptive coping behaviours and social support and guidance that enable them to manage the negative effects of self-stigma (Albery & Frings, 2016;Best et al, 2017;Bliuc, Best, Beckwith, & Iqbal, 2017;Chou et al, 2013, Frings & Albery, 2015. However, the results of our analysis have paradoxically linked social identification to both psychological well-being and lesser self-efficacy.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…As an extension of SIT, Best et al () proposed the social identity model of recovery (SIMOR), which frames recovery from addiction as a process of social identity change, whereby individuals gradually adopt the norms and values of new (more functional) membership groups and move away from old using social networks and the resulting identities. The internalisation of recovery values and norms then shapes subsequent attitudes and behaviours related to substance use, typically involving reduced exposure to conditioned cues that increase the risk of relapse and avoidance of substance use (Best, Irving, Collinson, Andersson, & Edwards, ). SIMOR argues that individuals can establish positive identities regardless of continuing symptoms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, to support recovery goals, they will need to negotiate how they engage with members to minimise social influence around substance use. A SIMbased tool may also be used alongside community development practices to connect people with a broad range of recovery supportive groups where such supports are lacking in one's existing network (Best, Irving, Collinson, Andersson & Edwards, 2017). Changes can then be assessed by repeating the SIM-AR task in a therapeutic session, drawing comparisons with a previous map.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent research highlights interpersonal processes (Demaeyer et al, , 2011Best et al, 2016b). Best et al (2016bBest et al ( , 2017 argue that recovery occurs primarily through changes in social networks, proposing a Social Identity Model Of Recovery (SIMOR) (Best et al 2016b).…”
Section: Narrative Theory and Substance Misusementioning
confidence: 99%