2006
DOI: 10.1016/s0079-6123(06)57009-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recovery from aphasia following brain injury: the role of reorganization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
69
0
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
1
69
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In the course of deafness, we observed a growing phonological implication of the right PSTG/SMG, whereas the implication of the left PSTG/ SMG in sound imagery decreased. Transcallosal disinhibition is an adaptive behavior that is frequently reported after left strokes [Marsh and Hillis, 2006]; if contralateral compensation resulted from bilateral interhemispheric disinhibition following the declining efficiency of both PSTG/ SMG, we should not observe this asymmetry, but instead a bilateral positive correlation with deafness (either with the duration of hearing loss or of auditory deprivation). We therefore conclude that the remarkable involvement of the right PSTG/SMG in phonological processing resulted from specific cognitive factors, i.e., the need to maintain phonological processing for visual communication, such as in speech-reading [Lazard et al, 2010b;Mortensen et al, 2006;Suh et al, 2009].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the course of deafness, we observed a growing phonological implication of the right PSTG/SMG, whereas the implication of the left PSTG/ SMG in sound imagery decreased. Transcallosal disinhibition is an adaptive behavior that is frequently reported after left strokes [Marsh and Hillis, 2006]; if contralateral compensation resulted from bilateral interhemispheric disinhibition following the declining efficiency of both PSTG/ SMG, we should not observe this asymmetry, but instead a bilateral positive correlation with deafness (either with the duration of hearing loss or of auditory deprivation). We therefore conclude that the remarkable involvement of the right PSTG/SMG in phonological processing resulted from specific cognitive factors, i.e., the need to maintain phonological processing for visual communication, such as in speech-reading [Lazard et al, 2010b;Mortensen et al, 2006;Suh et al, 2009].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…As most cognitive functions are asymmetrically implemented in the brain [Formisano et al, 2008;Hickok and Poeppel, 2007;Hugdahl, 2000], the engagement of the contralateral cortex may be less efficient than the primary functional organization, and hence maladaptive [Kell et al, 2009;Marsh and Hillis, 2006;Martin and Ayala, 2004;Naeser et al, 2005;Preibisch et al, 2003;van Oers et al, 2010].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Answering these questions could help with the development of appropriate language rehabilitation methods and thus have benefits for clinical practice. Previous reports on the role of the nondominant hemisphere after injury have produced controversial and inconsistent results (Marsh et al, 2006;Crosson et al, 2009). According to some authors, the participation of the nondominant hemisphere is required during reorganization (Calvert et al, 2000;Crinion and Price, 2005;Pulvermüller et al, 2005;Jensen et al, 2011) at least during the early stages of recovery (Knopman et al, 1983;Weiller et al, 1995;Elkana et al, 2011).…”
Section: Laterality Indexmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There were differences between individuals in the initial value of total energy expenditure and cognitive FIM, as shown in Table 1, the initial value of total energy expenditure ranging from 1133 to 2762 kcal, and the initial value of cognitive FIM ranging widely from 6 to 34. This was because cognitive function in the moderate to severe stroke group would have been affected by the complicated reconstruction of the nervous system that occurred in the recovery phase, and in some cases consciousness disorder and language dysfunction remained (Marsh et al, 2006). Moreover, it is considered that there were differences between individuals in the initial value of cognitive FIM.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%