1981
DOI: 10.1016/s0095-4470(19)30928-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recovery from adaptation to stimuli varying in voice onset time

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
3

Year Published

1982
1982
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
15
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, when test tokens were presented to the contralateral ear, the adaptation remained stable for 25 min, but at longer delays the small residual effects were not significantly different from zero. These graphs illustrate the quite different duration of adaptation found in the current study than that found by Sharf and Ohde (1981) effects here…”
Section: Part 4: Adaptation Effects On Three Time Scalescontrasting
confidence: 48%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In contrast, when test tokens were presented to the contralateral ear, the adaptation remained stable for 25 min, but at longer delays the small residual effects were not significantly different from zero. These graphs illustrate the quite different duration of adaptation found in the current study than that found by Sharf and Ohde (1981) effects here…”
Section: Part 4: Adaptation Effects On Three Time Scalescontrasting
confidence: 48%
“…Given the above, and in contrast with Sharf and Ohde (1981), the present research therefore distinguished between testing in the ear that received the adaptor versus the ear that did not. This allowed us to map out, on three different time scales (i.e., hours, minutes seconds), the time course and recovery time for phonetic adaptation, separately for central and peripheral levels.…”
Section: Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations