2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.cma.2014.01.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recovery-based error estimator for stabilized finite element methods for the Stokes equation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We can repeat this refinement process until the mesh meets a termination criterion, for example, a given maximum number of refinements, or the tolerance of global estimator such that < . For more details on the explanation and numerical property of this error estimator for Euclidean domains, see the works of Ainsworth et al 38 and Song et al 42 The above refinement process is based on comparing the continuous and discontinuous gradients as well as the local and global information. Therefore, the developed method works well for problems with large variations of the gradient of the solution.…”
Section: A Gradient Recovery-based Error Estimatormentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We can repeat this refinement process until the mesh meets a termination criterion, for example, a given maximum number of refinements, or the tolerance of global estimator such that < . For more details on the explanation and numerical property of this error estimator for Euclidean domains, see the works of Ainsworth et al 38 and Song et al 42 The above refinement process is based on comparing the continuous and discontinuous gradients as well as the local and global information. Therefore, the developed method works well for problems with large variations of the gradient of the solution.…”
Section: A Gradient Recovery-based Error Estimatormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with the residual-based estimators, the gradient recovery-based estimator has advantage in capturing large variations in the gradient of the solution [38][39][40][41] and has been successfully applied to solving incompressible flow problems. 42,43 In the work of Wei et al, 44 the authors show the effectiveness of the super-convergence patch gradient recovery technique for surface diffusion PDEs, which inspires us to use the gradient recovery-based estimator in the AMR process. Moreover, the refinement technique employed is based on a local Delaunay algorithm on the tangent plane of the surface.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…For stabilized P 1 P 0 finite element method, residual‐based a posteriori error estimators have been studied by Kay and Silvester , Wang et al for the penalizing jump method and by Zheng et al for the projection method. Recovery‐based a posteriori error estimate for the Stokes equations is investigated in and for both stabilized methods. Moreover, a posteriori error estimates for low‐order nonconforming finite element methods have also been developed in .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recovery‐based a posteriori error estimate for the Stokes equations is investigated in and for both stabilized methods. Moreover, a posteriori error estimates for low‐order nonconforming finite element methods have also been developed in .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Let us finally note that previous works on the a posteriori estimates for stabilized methods have mostly been confined to low order methods or to methods with stabilizing pressure jump terms, cf. [8,11,12,14,19,18]. As mentioned in the introduction, our estimates are the same as in [18], but our analysis is more straightforward.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%