2018
DOI: 10.5194/isprs-annals-iv-2-73-2018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recovering the 3d Pose and Shape of Vehicles From Stereo Images

Abstract: ABSTRACT:The precise reconstruction and pose estimation of vehicles plays an important role, e.g. for autonomous driving. We tackle this problem on the basis of street level stereo images obtained from a moving vehicle. Starting from initial vehicle detections, we use a deformable vehicle shape prior learned from CAD vehicle data to fully reconstruct the vehicles in 3D and to recover their 3D pose and shape. To fit a deformable vehicle model to each detection by inferring the optimal parameters for pose and sh… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For collaborative positioning tasks, the estimation of the orientation is the more sensitive factor: for an exemplary vehicle distance of 10 m, an orientation error of 2.8 • leads to around 50 cm error in positioning compared to the 34 cm resulting from the position estimation error. Using the Refine setting we are able to outperform the orientation estimation results of Coenen et al (2018) by 12.4 % and to achieve an equivalent amount of correct orientations as in Zia et al (2013) but with a 1.5 • smaller average error and without depending on good pose initialisations. Though, it has to be noted that in Zia et al (2013) no stereo information was used.…”
Section: Vehicle Reconstruction Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…For collaborative positioning tasks, the estimation of the orientation is the more sensitive factor: for an exemplary vehicle distance of 10 m, an orientation error of 2.8 • leads to around 50 cm error in positioning compared to the 34 cm resulting from the position estimation error. Using the Refine setting we are able to outperform the orientation estimation results of Coenen et al (2018) by 12.4 % and to achieve an equivalent amount of correct orientations as in Zia et al (2013) but with a 1.5 • smaller average error and without depending on good pose initialisations. Though, it has to be noted that in Zia et al (2013) no stereo information was used.…”
Section: Vehicle Reconstruction Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…However, using scene flow for object detection is computationally expensive. Coenen et al (2018) combine 3D stereo information with image cues to derive an ASM representation for vehicle detections. However, their results show only limited benefit from incorporating the image information.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations