1996
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1096-9934(199608)16:5<545::aid-fut3>3.3.co;2-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recovering probabilistic information from option markets: Tests of distributional assumptions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…To extract the implied volatilities from the premiums, we approximate the RNVM by the lognormal distribution that has worked reasonably well for obtaining the implied volatilities in the soybean and other agricultural options markets (Fackler and King 1989;Sherrick, Garcia, and Tirupattur 1996). The discount factor b(T) is calculated by compounding the corresponding three-month T-Bill rate obtained from the Federal Reserve.…”
Section: Volatility Estimatesmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To extract the implied volatilities from the premiums, we approximate the RNVM by the lognormal distribution that has worked reasonably well for obtaining the implied volatilities in the soybean and other agricultural options markets (Fackler and King 1989;Sherrick, Garcia, and Tirupattur 1996). The discount factor b(T) is calculated by compounding the corresponding three-month T-Bill rate obtained from the Federal Reserve.…”
Section: Volatility Estimatesmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Following Fackler and King (1989) and Sherrick, Garcia, and Tirupattur (1996), we assume no-arbitrage conditions and use Cox and Ross' (1976) description of options premiums as the discounted expected future payoffs against a risk-neutral valuation measure (RNVM) to characterize the price distribution of the underlying asset. Current premiums of European call and put options are given by where V c and V p are the premiums of European call and put options, x is the strike price, T is the time to expiration, F T is the price of the underlying asset at expiration, b(T) is the discount factor, and g(F T ) is the market expected probability density function of the underlying asset price F T at maturity.…”
Section: Volatility Estimatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Informative prices often translate directly into accurate forecasts of future events. For example, prices of financial options are good probability assessments of the future prices of the underlying assets [31]; prices in political stock markets, like the Iowa Electronic Market (IEM), 1 can furnish better estimates of likely election outcomes than traditional polls [11,12]; odds in horse races, determined solely by how much is bet on which horses, match very closely with the horses' actual frequencies of winning [1,30,32,33,35]; and point-spread betting markets yield unbiased predictions of sporting event outcomes [14]. Several studies demonstrate that, in a laboratory setting, markets are often able to aggregate information optimally [10,25,26,27].…”
Section: Collective Forecastsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[13] and kappa distribution in the meteorological literature ( [17], 18]). The Burr III distribution has been useful in financial literature, environmental studies, in survival and reliability theory, (such as: [1,7,10,14,19,26,27]). Recently, [25] proposed the use of the so-called extended Burr.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%