2015 IEEE International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium 2015
DOI: 10.1109/ipdps.2015.120
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recovering from Overload in Multicore Mixed-Criticality Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…e horizontal axis gives total system utilization. 12 For each utilization, the vertical axis gives the proportion of randomly generated task systems that were schedulable under each considered scheme. For example, the circled point in Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…e horizontal axis gives total system utilization. 12 For each utilization, the vertical axis gives the proportion of randomly generated task systems that were schedulable under each considered scheme. For example, the circled point in Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…e desire to host real-time workloads on multicore platforms in safety-critical application domains has been stymied by a problem dubbed the "one-out-of-m" problem [12,30]: when certifying the real-time correctness of a system running on m cores, analysis pessimism can be so excessive that the processing capacity of the "additional" m − 1 cores is entirely negated. In e ect, only "one core's worth" of capacity can be utilized even though m cores are available.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Resources that are shared among cores such as main memories, memory buses, and caches in their scheduling or analysis may also lead to much pessimism underlying the problem. 81 Chisholm et al 31¯r stly considered tradeo®s on multicore platforms for data sharing, where capacity loss is decreased by using both hardware-management methods 82 and MC con¯guration assumptions, and described a novel implementation of MC2, which extends the previous one by enabling tasks to communicate over shared memory, and o®ers approaches for administrating the DRAM memory banks and LLC. However, these approaches do not include intertask interferences resulting from accessing resources which are shared among cores such as main memories, memory buses, and caches in their scheduling or analysis.…”
Section: Qos-oriented Techniques In MC Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Erickson et al [17] proposed a scheduling framework for multicore mixed criticality systems to recover from transient overload scenarios. The recovery relies on scaling the task inter-release times to reduce the jobs frequency.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%