2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.epsl.2015.04.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recording the transition from flare-up to steady-state arc magmatism at the Purico–Chascon volcanic complex, northern Chile

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
31
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
5
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The anomalies C1 and C2 coincide spatially with the depths of crystallization (approximately 7 km) proposed by Godoy et al (), for the Chao and Paniri volcano. Considering the values of SiO 2 , N a 2 O, temperature, and pressure observed in Chao volcano, we estimated resistivities using Sigmelts (Pommier & Le Trong, ), obtaining values consistent with those observed in the 3‐D inversion models, and consistence with a melt percentage presented by Burns et al (), Watss et al (), and De Silva et al (), all of this information indicates the possible location of a magmatic body below the Paniri and Chao volcanoes. The difference in values of conductivity, depth, and composition indicate a possible separation between the shallower magmatic structure associated with Paniri volcano (C2) and Lavas de Chao (C1); however, the hypothesis of a common deep magmatic source cannot be discarded.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The anomalies C1 and C2 coincide spatially with the depths of crystallization (approximately 7 km) proposed by Godoy et al (), for the Chao and Paniri volcano. Considering the values of SiO 2 , N a 2 O, temperature, and pressure observed in Chao volcano, we estimated resistivities using Sigmelts (Pommier & Le Trong, ), obtaining values consistent with those observed in the 3‐D inversion models, and consistence with a melt percentage presented by Burns et al (), Watss et al (), and De Silva et al (), all of this information indicates the possible location of a magmatic body below the Paniri and Chao volcanoes. The difference in values of conductivity, depth, and composition indicate a possible separation between the shallower magmatic structure associated with Paniri volcano (C2) and Lavas de Chao (C1); however, the hypothesis of a common deep magmatic source cannot be discarded.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…On the other hand, studies carried out at Paniri volcano (De Silva & Francis, ), evidence its recent activity, while our study would provide relevant information regarding the magmatic source of this activity. Finally, studies conducted by Burns et al (), Watss et al (), and De Silva et al () indicate that all dome‐type volcanoes associated with the Altiplano‐Puna volcanic complex (APVC) will present high percentages of partial melt, information that coincides with resistivity analysis for the Chao volcano. This work should be of interest for researchers working in the Central Andes, and geoscientists studying subduction related volcanic systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The derivative basaltic andesite rises to further differentiate through melting and mixing at higher levels in the crust (Figure ). This would be the common mechanism for generating a large amount of crustal melt [ Burns et al ., ; de Silva , ; Kimura and Nagahashi , ]. Breakdown of hydrous minerals in crustal rocks, e.g., biotite in granitic rocks [ Brown , ] or amphibole in the amphibolitic rocks [ Johannes and Holtz , ], enhances partial melting of the crust.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Estimates of the volume of partial melt in this zone are >20% ( Comeau et al, 2015), and plutonic:volcanic ratios of ~20:1 have been calculated (Ward et al, 2014), supporting the contention that the APMB is the intrusive equiva- lent of the voluminous APVC volcanics (de Silva et al, 2006). This upper crustal MASH (melting, assimilation, storage, homogenization;after Hildreth and Moorbath, 1988) zone (Burns et al, 2015), represents the largest known continental crustal magmatic zone (Zandt et al, 2003;Ward et al, 2014). Continued magmatic activity in the APMB is inferred from satellite interferometry studies (Pritchard and Simons, 2002;Fialko and Pearse, 2012) that have identified a zone of surface uplift centered on the composite volcano Uturuncu with an outer ring of subsidence that extends the surface deformation to ~150 km in diameter ( Fig.…”
Section: Geologic Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%