1993
DOI: 10.1016/0889-5406(93)70015-g
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Recording and measuring malocclusion: A review of the literature

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
48
0
10

Year Published

1999
1999
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
48
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…However, none has used the Angle classification of malocclusions, which is based on the anteroposterior relationship of the maxillary to the mandibular first molars. 11 Although the Angle classification was developed more than a century ago, it remains the most commonly used classification of malocclusions, [12][13][14][15] and its universal acceptance by the dental profession is evidence of its practicality. 15 Because Angle classification is widely used and no studies have used it to evaluate quality of life, the present study was designed to fill this gap in the literature and to expand current knowledge about the impacts of malocclusion on quality of life.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, none has used the Angle classification of malocclusions, which is based on the anteroposterior relationship of the maxillary to the mandibular first molars. 11 Although the Angle classification was developed more than a century ago, it remains the most commonly used classification of malocclusions, [12][13][14][15] and its universal acceptance by the dental profession is evidence of its practicality. 15 Because Angle classification is widely used and no studies have used it to evaluate quality of life, the present study was designed to fill this gap in the literature and to expand current knowledge about the impacts of malocclusion on quality of life.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…), or a disassociation between the dental arches in any of the three planes of direction (Proffit, 1986). While there are many references regarding the treatment of malocclusion in the clinical literature (Angle, 1907;Dahiya et al, 2017;Singhal et al, 2015), there is little consensus on how it is quantified or fully defined (Tang and Wei., 1993). The earliest and still commonly used classification of malocclusion is that offered by Angle (1899).…”
Section: Dental Crowding and Occlusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, countries that have health services which offer orthodontic treatment have developed and applied a series of quantitative methods (malocclusion indices) to detect the severity and treatment need of each case, in an attempt to define the priority of some cases over others objectively and thus rationalize their public expenditure. Tang and Wei (1993) reviewed the literature and summarized the evolution of methods for recording malocclusion in recent decades. They concluded that the trend in both qualitative and quantitative methods has changed, as initially researchers did not define the signs of malocclusion before recording them, chose the variables arbitrarily and recorded the data according to a criterion of all or nothing.…”
Section: History Evolution Classification and Properties Of Treatmementioning
confidence: 99%