2017
DOI: 10.1002/pip.2914
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Record 1.0 V open‐circuit voltage in wide band gap chalcopyrite solar cells

Abstract: Tandem solar cell structures require a high-performance wide band gap absorber as top cell. A possible candidate is CuGaSe 2 , with a fundamental band gap of 1.7 eV. However, a significant open-circuit voltage deficit is often reported for wide band gap chalcopyrite solar cells like CuGaSe 2 . In this paper, we show that the open-circuit voltage can be drastically improved in wide band gap p-Cu(In,Ga)Se 2 and p-CuGaSe 2 devices by improving the conduction band alignment to the n-type buffer layer. This is acco… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
99
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(102 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
3
99
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Comparison of some reported exceptional V OC values for chalcopyrite solar cells achieved by different groups and from this work (only samples with clear “spike” configuration excluding Ag80Ga85). “ZMO” stands for Zn‐Mg‐O buffer, “PDT” for applied alkali PDT, “mono” for monocrystalline absorber, and “p.a.” for post‐annealing.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Comparison of some reported exceptional V OC values for chalcopyrite solar cells achieved by different groups and from this work (only samples with clear “spike” configuration excluding Ag80Ga85). “ZMO” stands for Zn‐Mg‐O buffer, “PDT” for applied alkali PDT, “mono” for monocrystalline absorber, and “p.a.” for post‐annealing.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…However, so far, wide‐gap chalcopyrite solar cells cannot compete with their low band gap counterparts. An efficiency drop of more than 10% absolute is reported when going from the current record device with a band gap of E g ~1.1 eV (η = 23.35% for sulfurized CIGS; η = 22.6% for pure CIGS) to a solar cell with E g > 1.6 eV (η = 11.9%) . The most pronounced limitation for wide‐gap chalcopyrite solar cells is the low V OC relative to the band gap, which typically increases slower (often referred to as “ V OC saturation”) for E g > 1.3 eV (ie, [Ga]/([Ga] + [In]) ≡ GGI > 0.4 in CIGS) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One possibility would be to replace the Mo back contact that is known to be thermodynamically instable [30] with other materials or add a suitable barrier layer between absorber and back contact. The absorber itself also needs to be optimized in terms of grain growth, and the use of a different buffer layer with proper band alignment might be especially promising, since an open-circuit voltage of more than 1 V was recently achieved with a high band gap CuGaSe 2 absorber using a Zn 1-x Sn x O y buffer layer [31].…”
Section: Higher [S]/([s] + [Se])mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12 . PV data and related bandgaps from References [17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35] . Bandgaps are extracted from EQE spectra.…”
Section: Mapping Of Fundamental Failures In Cd-free Kesterite Solar Cmentioning
confidence: 99%