Recontextualising fascist ideologies of the past: right-wing discourses on employment and nativism in Austria and the United Kingdom

Richardson, John; Wodak, Ruth

doi:10.1080/17405900903180996

Cited by 92 publications

(56 citation statements)

References 7 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…My methodology draws on Critical Discourse Studies, and more specifically on the Discourse-Historical Approach (Heer et al 2008;Krzyżanowski 2010;Reisigl 2018;Reisigl & Wodak 2001Richardson 2017a;Richardson & Wodak 2009;Slavíčková 2013Slavíčková , 2014Wodak & De Cillia 2007;Wodak et al 1999), in order to make sense of (1) the field of remembrance and its genres (e.g. ceremonies, speeches, stories, testimony, music, minutes of silence, etc.)…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Sharing values to safeguard the future: British Holocaust Memorial Day commemoration as epideictic rhetoric

Richardson

2018

Discourse & Communication

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Sharing values to safeguard the future: British Holocaust Memorial Day commemoration as epideictic rhetoric

Richardson

2018

Discourse & Communication

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…These signifying practices could make sense only if Critical Discourse Analysis's stance of social inequalities and dialectical relationship between language and social reality (Fairclough, 2001) is merged with Discourse Historical Approach's levels of contexts, i.e. intertextuality and interdiscursivity, the extralinguistic social level and the sociopolitical and historical context of a particular text (Wodak and Meyer, 2009;Wodak and Reisigl, 2009;Richardson and Wodak, 2009a;Richardson and Wodak, 2009b). This paper brings together these perspectives of critical Discourse Analysis along with feminist perspective.…”

Section: Critical Discourse Analytical Approachesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Multimodal signs in (non)heteronormative discourse of transnational Hindi cinema: the case study of Hindi film Dostana

Rizwan

2014

RAEI

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article conducts a detailed analysis of multimodal signifiers in a popular Hindi film Dostana (meaning friendship) with particular focus on film's (non) heteronormative and sexist system of signification. The signifiers that construct gender and sexual stereotypical worldview of the film are analyzed following Lazar's (2007) conception of feminist critical discourse analysis and Wodak's (2001) framework of Discourse Historical Approach which proposes three simultaneously functioning aspects of discourse, i.e. immanent, diagnostic and prognostic. The multimodal signifiers in the film are analyzed within Indo-Pakistani discursive context where patriarchal discourse does not seem to allow any cognitive pattern and mental model other than heteronormativity and heterosexual love and romance. In such discursive set-up, so-called deviant sexualities and gender roles struggle for voice, signifiers and representation. The prognostic critique of this article can be thought of as Positive Discourse Analysis (Martin, 2004), because eventually film's text offers some examples of how certain multimodal signs can be used to resist hegemonic patriarchal and heteronormative discourses which are considered common sense and natural by mainstream Hindi film audience.

show abstract

“…For example, Waters' (1997) analysis of how discourses of "'dark strangers' in our midst" deployed by postWorld War II British writers on race relations served to "shore up definitions of essential Britishness" (pp. 208) illustrates the social functions that racist discourses may serve in particular historical periods; Richardson and Wodak's (2009) The forms of data analyzed in these studies typically consist of one or more of a wide range of texts -including materials that are produced from the outset in textual format (e.g., newspaper 8 articles, educational textbooks, and so on), talk that has been converted into textual format through institutional processes occurring prior to the researchers' use of them (e.g., official written records of parliamentary speeches and debates), talk that is converted into text during the course of the research process, and visual materials that are analytically treated as texts. As a result, although they allow for consideration of some of the gross content and audience-oriented or interactional features of the discourse(s) at hand, these materials do not lend themselves to fine-grained attention to potentially significant features of the spoken production of racial discourse, including their immediate uptake by their audiences (e.g., Verkuyten, 1998;Whitehead & Stokoe, 2015).…”

Section: "Elite" Texts and Talkmentioning

confidence: 99%

Discursive Approaches to Race and Racism

Whitehead¹

2017

Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Communication

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

SummaryIn the wake of what has been called the "discursive turn" or "linguistic turn" in the social sciences, research at the intersection of language and communication and race and racism shifted from being largely dominated by quantitative and experimental methods to include qualitative and particularly discursive approaches. While the term "discursive" potentially encompasses a wide range of modes of discourse analysis, discursive approaches share in common a focus on language use as social action, and as a constitutive feature of actions, events and situations, rather than as merely a passive means of describing or transmitting information about them.When applied to the study of race and racism, such approaches have examined ways in which language functions to construct, maintain and legitimate as well as subvert or resist racial and/or racist ideologies and social structures.Research in these areas has made use of a range of empirical materials, including "elite" texts and talk (media texts, parliamentary debates, academic texts, etc.), individual interviews, focus groups and group discussions, "naturally occurring" talk-in-interaction from conversational and institutional settings, and text-based online interactions. Although these different data types should not be seen as strictly mutually exclusive, each of them serves to foreground particular features of racial or racist discourse(s), thus facilitating or constraining particular sorts of discourse analytic findings. Thus, different data sources respectively tend to foreground ideological features of racial discourse(s) and their intersection with power and domination, 2 including examination of "new" racisms and the production and management of accusations and denials of racism; discursive processes involved in the construction and uses of racial subjectivities and identities; interactional processes through which prejudice and racism are constructed and contested; and the everyday interactional reproduction of systems of racial categories, independently of whether the talk in which they occur can or should be considered "racist".

show abstract

Recontextualising fascist ideologies of the past: right-wing discourses on employment and nativism in Austria and the United Kingdom

Cited by 92 publications

References 7 publications

Sharing values to safeguard the future: British Holocaust Memorial Day commemoration as epideictic rhetoric

Sharing values to safeguard the future: British Holocaust Memorial Day commemoration as epideictic rhetoric

Multimodal signs in (non)heteronormative discourse of transnational Hindi cinema: the case study of Hindi film Dostana

Discursive Approaches to Race and Racism

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About