2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2018.07.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Reconstruction with submental flap for aggressive orofacial cancer- an updated series

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
13
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
13
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Revision cases and irradiated necks were excluded from the study anticipating a compromised vascular pedicle, although successful reconstruction of the submental island flap in the irradiated neck has been described in the irradiated neck which is also a relative contraindication for free flaps reconstruction 9, 10. Submental island flap is found to be associated with low mortality and morbidity as was evident in our study till 6 months of follow-up, also described in the past literature 8, 11, 12, 13. Hair growth in the oral cavity can be a problem in the postoperative period, as mucosalization occurs with the course of time in the majority of the patients or else radiotherapy itself causes burning of the hair follicles.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Revision cases and irradiated necks were excluded from the study anticipating a compromised vascular pedicle, although successful reconstruction of the submental island flap in the irradiated neck has been described in the irradiated neck which is also a relative contraindication for free flaps reconstruction 9, 10. Submental island flap is found to be associated with low mortality and morbidity as was evident in our study till 6 months of follow-up, also described in the past literature 8, 11, 12, 13. Hair growth in the oral cavity can be a problem in the postoperative period, as mucosalization occurs with the course of time in the majority of the patients or else radiotherapy itself causes burning of the hair follicles.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Reconstruction of oral cavity defects following radical surgery for SCC can be achieved by a variety of techniques [1][2][3][4][5][6] . The choice is influenced by several factors, including size and location of the defect, patient characteristics, donor site morbidity, and functional and aesthetic outcomes [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13] . Nowadays microvascular free flaps, for instance anterolateral tight (ALTFF) and radial forearm (RFFF), are considered the gold standard among head and neck surgeons for restoration of oral defects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nowadays microvascular free flaps, for instance anterolateral tight (ALTFF) and radial forearm (RFFF), are considered the gold standard among head and neck surgeons for restoration of oral defects. However, in some particular situations, as in compromised patient in which a time-consuming procedure is at high risk, a pedicled flap could be a better choice [9][10][11][12][13] . Moreover, in small defects the donor site morbidity and aesthetic outcomes have to be taken into account 2,4 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The submental island flap (SIF) is an excellent option for reconstructing a variety of defects that extend beyond the lower facial region. Several studies have outlined practical advantages of the SIF, including safe dissection by residents in-training, enhanced outcomes when compared to radial forearm free flaps for similar defects, and excellent cosmetic results at both defect and donor sites [1,3,[9][10][11][12][13].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%